On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:29 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >>> >>>> Moving a member in a well-defined structure doesn't fall into this >>>> generally accepted change (expanding the length of a struct.) >>>> Consider the shm array change doesn't fall into the "it is just >>>> a longer struct" example. >>> >>> Can you please give me a pointer which shm array change you are referring >>> to? >> >> r1824504 > > I'm not sure it falls outside our guarantees, the old "hostname" field > is still there (at the same place) and populated.
NUL \0 delimited? Cool. Provided mod_status and mod_cluster 2.4.29 won't crash, *for display purposes* we can agree that isn't a concern. (mod_cluster updates will crash and we can agree that was extending the API contract to an unrealistic bounds.) Bill
