> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Februar 2018 22:29 > An: httpd <dev@httpd.apache.org> > Betreff: Re: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 - > /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS) > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > > >> Moving a member in a well-defined structure doesn't fall into this > >> generally accepted change (expanding the length of a struct.) > >> Consider the shm array change doesn't fall into the "it is just > >> a longer struct" example. > > > > Can you please give me a pointer which shm array change you are > referring to? > > r1824504
Thanks. What particular breakage are you referring to in the above revision? As far as I can tell, the bug does not get fixed for modules that do not use the new field, but it doesn't break them. Regards Rüdiger
