Brandon
On 10/3/06, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Heh, well, I am for it.
I think either way (APT or docbook) we can switch later, so to me it's
not a decision that we need to really sweat over (on this project).
I think with a little effort, we can create a modular main document
that includes the child documents. I could take a crack at it later
today with the dev guide.
The tutorial is on the list somewhere already.
Larry
On 10/3/06, Clinton Begin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sold, at least enough to give it a shot.
>
> I'm giving DocBook my +1.
>
> What does everyone else think?
>
> Clinton
>
> On 10/3/06, Jeff Butler < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > For me the main advantage is that the source is plain XML so it's
> diffable.
> >
> > Another advantage is that the source can be transformed into a large
> variety of formats (PDF, HTML, Word, Eclipse Help, etc.)
> >
> > Most publishers accept DOCBOOK markup as input. So if anyone every wanted
> to publish the developer's guide, it would be simple. (I know this is not
> really going to happen, but I think it says something that places like
> O'Reilly accept DOCBOOK)
> >
> > Jeff Butler
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/3/06, Clinton Begin < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm going to look at DocBook again. I'll download the XMLMind editor
> and the .NET guide (but I've heard that some people just use an IDE...no
> XMLMind necessary).
> > >
> > > But just to refresh my memory....what are the advantages of DocBook over
> OOo....?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Clinton
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
