+1. It is a no-brainer to me given it is more search-engine friendly compared to slack and email. It won't have the retention issue from Slack as well. I'd like to see it on other Iceberg repos as well.
Yufei On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 3:01 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for enabling it on iceberg-rust first. > > I am curious how search-engine friendly this is, that will be a huge plus > if people can find these discussion contents. For people who have used it > more like Piotr, do you know about this? I search Trino things quite a lot > on Google, but rarely did I find GitHub discussion links popping up. > > -Jack > > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 9:05 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I'm a fan of having more things on github if possible. I haven't used >> this feature but it sounds like it could be useful. >> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 6:15 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I’m fine with enabling it in iceberg-rust first and see how it goes. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 17:39 Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for raising this. I would also prefer discussions over a user >>>> mailing-list since it has a lower barrier. We could also first enable this >>>> on Iceberg-rust and evaluate it after a while to see the added value and >>>> then decide for Python and Java? WDYT? >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Fokko >>>> >>>> Op wo 10 jul 2024 om 10:14 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>> j...@nanthrax.net>: >>>> >>>>> Yes and no :) >>>>> >>>>> It's a beta feature. My point is that we can enabled GitHub Discussion >>>>> easily, and depending of the timing, asf.yaml support will be added. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 7:49 AM Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > > Regarding the discussion tab, it sounds good to me. It's pretty >>>>> > straight forward to do by editing .asf.yaml. >>>>> > >>>>> > I tried this before. But the asf.yaml doesn't support controling >>>>> discussion yet. >>>>> > We need the help from infra team. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=INFRA&title=git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-GitHubDiscussions >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 13:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>> > > Hi >>>>> > > >>>>> > > It's also possible to create a user mailing list if it helps. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Regarding the discussion tab, it sounds good to me. It's pretty >>>>> > > straight forward to do by editing .asf.yaml. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Regards >>>>> > > JB >>>>> > > >>>>> > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 5:18 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Hi: >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Recently we have observed more and more user interested in >>>>> iceberg-rust, and they have many questions about it, for example the >>>>> status, relationship with others such pyiceberg. Slack is a great place to >>>>> discussion, but is not friendly for long discussion and not easy to >>>>> comment. We can also encourage user to use github issue, but it's easy to >>>>> mix with true issues, e.g. feature tracking, bug tracking, etc. >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> So I propose to enable the discussion tab for repos of iceberg >>>>> and subprojects such as iceberg-rust, pyiceberg, iceberg-go. >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Xuanwo >>>>> > >>>>> > https://xuanwo.io/ >>>>> >>>>
