+1 (non-binding) I have a question about iceberg versioning. After the 1.6 release, will there be versions 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9, or will it go straight to 2.0?
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 5:32 PM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> wrote: > If JDK 8 support is dropped in 2.0, will we continue to fix critical > issues in 1.6+? > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:35 AM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding), I did not expect this to be a vote thread, but overall +1 >> for dropping JDK8 support. >> >> -Jack >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:30 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1(binding), as much as I want to drop JDK 8, still encourage everyone >>> to spark out about any concerns. >>> Yufei >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:24 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:37 AM Piotr Findeisen < >>>> piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> in the "Building with JDK 21" email thread we discussed adding JDK 21 >>>>> support and also dropping JDK 8 support, as these things were initially >>>>> related. >>>>> A lot of people expressed acceptance for dropping JDK 8 support, and >>>>> release 2.0 was proposed as a timeline. >>>>> There were also concerned raised, as some people still use JDK 8. >>>>> >>>>> Let me start this new thread for a discussion and perhaps formal vote >>>>> for dropping JDK 8 support in Iceberg 2.0 release. >>>>> >>>>> Best >>>>> Piotr >>>>> >>>>>
