+1 for dropping JDK 8 in Iceberg 2.0. I also wonder the same thing as Huaxin (sorry if I missed a previous thread on Iceberg 2.0 plan).
Also as Huaxin has discovered in Spark 4.0 Support PR <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10622>, looks like we may have to drop Java8 first in Spark 4.0 module, due to it being dropped in Spark 4.0, before Iceberg 2.0. Thanks Szehon On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:31 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I have a question about iceberg versioning. After the 1.6 release, will > there be versions 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9, or will it go straight to 2.0? > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 5:32 PM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> If JDK 8 support is dropped in 2.0, will we continue to fix critical >> issues in 1.6+? >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:35 AM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding), I did not expect this to be a vote thread, but overall +1 >>> for dropping JDK8 support. >>> >>> -Jack >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:30 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1(binding), as much as I want to drop JDK 8, still encourage everyone >>>> to spark out about any concerns. >>>> Yufei >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:24 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:37 AM Piotr Findeisen < >>>>> piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> in the "Building with JDK 21" email thread we discussed adding JDK 21 >>>>>> support and also dropping JDK 8 support, as these things were initially >>>>>> related. >>>>>> A lot of people expressed acceptance for dropping JDK 8 support, and >>>>>> release 2.0 was proposed as a timeline. >>>>>> There were also concerned raised, as some people still use JDK 8. >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me start this new thread for a discussion and perhaps formal vote >>>>>> for dropping JDK 8 support in Iceberg 2.0 release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best >>>>>> Piotr >>>>>> >>>>>>
