+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Jul 23, 2024, 07:15 Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:54 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Manu, >> >> If JDK 8 support is dropped in 2.0, will we continue to fix critical >>> issues in 1.6+? >>> >> Nothing stops people from cutting a release, and it becomes an official >> release once it is approved. Here is the Apache Release Policy for >> reference, https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html. >> >> Yufei >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 7:22 PM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:40 AM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 for dropping JDK 8 in Iceberg 2.0. I also wonder the same thing as >>>> Huaxin (sorry if I missed a previous thread on Iceberg 2.0 plan). >>>> >>>> Also as Huaxin has discovered in Spark 4.0 Support PR >>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10622>, looks like we may have >>>> to drop Java8 first in Spark 4.0 module, due to it being dropped in Spark >>>> 4.0, before Iceberg 2.0. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Szehon >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:31 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> I have a question about iceberg versioning. After the 1.6 release, >>>>> will there be versions 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9, or will it go straight to 2.0? >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 5:32 PM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> If JDK 8 support is dropped in 2.0, will we continue to fix critical >>>>>> issues in 1.6+? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:35 AM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (binding), I did not expect this to be a vote thread, but >>>>>>> overall +1 for dropping JDK8 support. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Jack >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:30 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1(binding), as much as I want to drop JDK 8, still encourage >>>>>>>> everyone to spark out about any concerns. >>>>>>>> Yufei >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:24 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:37 AM Piotr Findeisen < >>>>>>>>> piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> in the "Building with JDK 21" email thread we discussed adding >>>>>>>>>> JDK 21 support and also dropping JDK 8 support, as these things were >>>>>>>>>> initially related. >>>>>>>>>> A lot of people expressed acceptance for dropping JDK 8 support, >>>>>>>>>> and release 2.0 was proposed as a timeline. >>>>>>>>>> There were also concerned raised, as some people still use JDK 8. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Let me start this new thread for a discussion and perhaps formal >>>>>>>>>> vote for dropping JDK 8 support in Iceberg 2.0 release. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best >>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
