+1 On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:49 PM Péter Váry <peter.vary.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024, 07:15 Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:54 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Manu, >>> >>> If JDK 8 support is dropped in 2.0, will we continue to fix critical >>>> issues in 1.6+? >>>> >>> Nothing stops people from cutting a release, and it becomes an official >>> release once it is approved. Here is the Apache Release Policy for >>> reference, https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html. >>> >>> Yufei >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 7:22 PM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:40 AM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 for dropping JDK 8 in Iceberg 2.0. I also wonder the same thing as >>>>> Huaxin (sorry if I missed a previous thread on Iceberg 2.0 plan). >>>>> >>>>> Also as Huaxin has discovered in Spark 4.0 Support PR >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10622>, looks like we may >>>>> have to drop Java8 first in Spark 4.0 module, due to it being dropped in >>>>> Spark 4.0, before Iceberg 2.0. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Szehon >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:31 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a question about iceberg versioning. After the 1.6 release, >>>>>> will there be versions 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9, or will it go straight to 2.0? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 5:32 PM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> If JDK 8 support is dropped in 2.0, will we continue to fix critical >>>>>>> issues in 1.6+? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:35 AM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (binding), I did not expect this to be a vote thread, but >>>>>>>> overall +1 for dropping JDK8 support. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Jack >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:30 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1(binding), as much as I want to drop JDK 8, still encourage >>>>>>>>> everyone to spark out about any concerns. >>>>>>>>> Yufei >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:24 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:37 AM Piotr Findeisen < >>>>>>>>>> piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> in the "Building with JDK 21" email thread we discussed adding >>>>>>>>>>> JDK 21 support and also dropping JDK 8 support, as these things were >>>>>>>>>>> initially related. >>>>>>>>>>> A lot of people expressed acceptance for dropping JDK 8 support, >>>>>>>>>>> and release 2.0 was proposed as a timeline. >>>>>>>>>>> There were also concerned raised, as some people still use JDK 8. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Let me start this new thread for a discussion and perhaps formal >>>>>>>>>>> vote for dropping JDK 8 support in Iceberg 2.0 release. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best >>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- Ryan Blue Databricks
