Hi all,

Please take a minute to vote on this spec change.

Casting my own vote: +1 (non-binding).

Thanks,
Alex

On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 10:49 PM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start a vote to formalize remote signing configuration in
> the REST spec.
>
> The proposed changes introduce a new RemoteSigningConfig object in the
> LoadTableResult schema, containing properties and headers that signers
> should send back to the signing endpoint.
>
> The spec changes are in this PR:
>
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16822
>
> Relevant discussions:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/gz5nm2xzlhzbc2y3sfossgflnkbm6vq5
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/krvmczlbwpbn08c45w1dtvr5tor6ol1y
>
> Many thanks to everyone who provided feedback!
>
> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Adopt the remote signing configuration changes
> [ ] +0: . . .
> [ ] -1: Do not adopt the remote signing configuration changes because . . .
>
> Thanks,
> Alex

Reply via email to