Hi all, Thank you for voting! With 5 binding and 2 non-binding votes, the vote has passed. I'll send out the result mail shortly.
Thanks, Alex On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 12:57 AM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1(binding) > > Yufei > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 10:54 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 3:41 AM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026, 2:55 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> вт, 28 июл. 2026 г., 20:44 Prashant Singh <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> +1, thank you for all the work and patience Alex >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Prashant >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 10:17 AM Russell Spitzer >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 4:03 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please take a minute to vote on this spec change. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Casting my own vote: +1 (non-binding). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 10:49 PM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Hi all, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I'd like to start a vote to formalize remote signing configuration in >>>>>>> > the REST spec. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > The proposed changes introduce a new RemoteSigningConfig object in the >>>>>>> > LoadTableResult schema, containing properties and headers that signers >>>>>>> > should send back to the signing endpoint. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > The spec changes are in this PR: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16822 >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Relevant discussions: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/gz5nm2xzlhzbc2y3sfossgflnkbm6vq5 >>>>>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/krvmczlbwpbn08c45w1dtvr5tor6ol1y >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Many thanks to everyone who provided feedback! >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > [ ] +1: Adopt the remote signing configuration changes >>>>>>> > [ ] +0: . . . >>>>>>> > [ ] -1: Do not adopt the remote signing configuration changes because >>>>>>> > . . . >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Thanks, >>>>>>> > Alex
