+1 (binding) On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 4:03 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Please take a minute to vote on this spec change. > > Casting my own vote: +1 (non-binding). > > Thanks, > Alex > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 10:49 PM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to start a vote to formalize remote signing configuration in > > the REST spec. > > > > The proposed changes introduce a new RemoteSigningConfig object in the > > LoadTableResult schema, containing properties and headers that signers > > should send back to the signing endpoint. > > > > The spec changes are in this PR: > > > > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16822 > > > > Relevant discussions: > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/gz5nm2xzlhzbc2y3sfossgflnkbm6vq5 > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/krvmczlbwpbn08c45w1dtvr5tor6ol1y > > > > Many thanks to everyone who provided feedback! > > > > Please vote in the next 72 hours: > > > > [ ] +1: Adopt the remote signing configuration changes > > [ ] +0: . . . > > [ ] -1: Do not adopt the remote signing configuration changes because . > . . > > > > Thanks, > > Alex >
