+1 (non-binding) вт, 28 июл. 2026 г., 20:44 Prashant Singh <[email protected]>:
> +1, thank you for all the work and patience Alex > > Thanks, > Prashant > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 10:17 AM Russell Spitzer < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 4:03 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Please take a minute to vote on this spec change. >>> >>> Casting my own vote: +1 (non-binding). >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Alex >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 10:49 PM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > I'd like to start a vote to formalize remote signing configuration in >>> > the REST spec. >>> > >>> > The proposed changes introduce a new RemoteSigningConfig object in the >>> > LoadTableResult schema, containing properties and headers that signers >>> > should send back to the signing endpoint. >>> > >>> > The spec changes are in this PR: >>> > >>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16822 >>> > >>> > Relevant discussions: >>> > >>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/gz5nm2xzlhzbc2y3sfossgflnkbm6vq5 >>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/krvmczlbwpbn08c45w1dtvr5tor6ol1y >>> > >>> > Many thanks to everyone who provided feedback! >>> > >>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>> > >>> > [ ] +1: Adopt the remote signing configuration changes >>> > [ ] +0: . . . >>> > [ ] -1: Do not adopt the remote signing configuration changes because >>> . . . >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Alex >>> >>
