Folks, As DML is the main feature for now, I propose to create *ignite-1.8 *branch when DML is ready. If nobody minds I will do that as soon as DML is merged and start vote when the rest minor things are cleared. Also I would like to remind that we still have a lot of tickets assigned on 1.8 version. Please look through tickets assigned to yourself and move them further if you do not think they will be ready in the nearest time.
Alexander, Do you have any estimates on when we can expect DML to be ready for merge? Igor, I looked at DML code and it appears to be almost ready at the moment. I think you can simply merge it into your PRs and continue with testing even before DML is officially merged. Vladimir. On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Igor Sapego <isap...@gridgain.com> wrote: > Denis, > > I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will break > tests > and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before DML is > merged. > > After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my changes and > check > that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and examples are > ready. > > > Best Regards, > Igor > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor binary mode) > > is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8. > > Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I can't > > answer your question since I don't see any date yet. > > > > By the way, you were going to help with the reviews. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > *Alexander P., Igor S.,* > > > > > > When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into 1.8 > > > branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation and be > > sure > > > that everything works as described on my side. > > > > > > *Pavel,* > > > > > > Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET usability > > > tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite users? > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 > > > > > > — > > > Denis > > > > > > On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > > > > > Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take over > the > > > release process of 1.8? > > > > > > — > > > Denis > > > > > > On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko < > > > alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Current status on DML: > > > > > > - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly about > > > configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify streamer's > > > batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily). > > > > > > - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir. > > > > > > - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash codes > > > generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I will ask > > > him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in > > > GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows: > > > - testPutWithFieldsHashing > > > - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity > > > - testPutWithCustomHashing > > > I added them personally during working on first version of auto > > > hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very hashing > > > features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So could > > > you please take a look? > > > > > > - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code. > > > > > > - Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
