Vyacheslav,

Let's create build plan on TC for this profile.
Why we need to merge it in master now?

В Вт, 05/06/2018 в 13:29 +0300, Vyacheslav Daradur пишет:
> Nikolay, there isn't anything broken in PR.
> 
> The PR is needed to add new build-plan on TC.
> 
> We need tools to check that fixes for 1.1 don't break compatibility with 1.0.
> 
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Кузнецов Алексей Львович
> <alkuznetsov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > After Alexander create separate tickets for failed tests, everybody is free
> > to fix them.
> > So we can proceed faster issue resolving.
> > 
> > > Hello, Igniters.
> > > 
> > > Actually, I don't understand why we should merge in master something
> > > broken.
> > > Currently, Ignite is not ready for JCache 1.1.
> > > 
> > > Only change I see in PR is new profile [1].
> > > Is it required to have it to continue jcache 1.1 support implementation?
> > > 
> > > I think Alexandex can proceed with current profile and change it  to run
> > > tests for JCache 1.1 his own branch.
> > > 
> > > Am I miss something?
> > > 
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4114
> > > 
> > > В Вт, 05/06/2018 в 12:50 +0300, Dmitry Pavlov пишет:
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Alexander,
> > > > 
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8687 is 'In progress'. Is 
> > > > it
> > > > expected?
> > > > 
> > > > Nikolay, have you some time to apply patch, if it passes review?
> > > > 
> > > > Sincerely,
> > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > 
> > > > вт, 5 июн. 2018 г. в 5:09, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>:
> > > > 
> > > > > Thanks, Alex! Sounds like a good plan.
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Александр Меньшиков
> > > > > <sharple...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > Igniters!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I have taken a look at the jcache 1.1 spec and TCK.
> > > > > > And I can write a brief summary of my plan to solve the task.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I have found 6 problems in current master with TCK 1.1 (104 failed
> > > > > 
> > > > > tests).
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Of course, we should run this TCK on CI to be absolutely sure we 
> > > > > > didn't
> > > > > > miss something.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > So the first step is an adding TCK 1.1 suite to our Team City.
> > > > > > I have created sub-task [1] for it and prepared the PR [2].
> > > > > > I need someone with access to merge PR and add suite to Team City.
> > > > > > It going to be just a clone of the current jcache-tck suite, but 
> > > > > > with
> > > > > 
> > > > > using
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > the new profile.
> > > > > > You can test new profile locally with the following command:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > mvn test -P-release,jcache-tck-1.1 -pl :ignite-core -am
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > After that, I will start to add sub-task for every problem we have.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Nikolay, can you please help me with merging [1] and adding to the
> > > > > > suite?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > [1]JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8687
> > > > > > [2]PR: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4114/files
> > > > > > [3]CI:
> > > > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=
> > > > > > IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=pull/4114/head&tab=
> > > > > > buildTypeStatusDiv
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 2018-05-23 14:31 GMT+03:00 Александр Меньшиков 
> > > > > > <sharple...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Thanks, Slava. You are right.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 2018-05-23 14:00 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur 
> > > > > > > <daradu...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Hi, Alex!
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Please have a look at maven profile named "jcache-tck".
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I believe this is what you are looking for.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Александр Меньшиков
> > > > > > > > <sharple...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Igniters,
> > > > > > > > > I think I can do it. As I see we already have JCache TCK 
> > > > > > > > > tests in
> > > > > 
> > > > > TC.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Can I take somewhere settings/script which we are using?
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 2018-05-23 2:58 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan 
> > > > > > > > > <dsetrak...@apache.org
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > :
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Igniters,
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > It will be great if someone in the community would pick 
> > > > > > > > > > this up.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > amount
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > of changes are minimal and many of them only have to do with
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > clarifying the
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > documentation. However, removing JSR 107 license confusion 
> > > > > > > > > > in 1.1
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > would be
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > great for Ignite.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > D.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Denis Magda 
> > > > > > > > > > <dma...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Here is a list of all changes:
> > > > > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jsr107/BC1qKqknzKU
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > The primary argument for the migration is a license. 
> > > > > > > > > > > JCache 1.0
> > > > > 
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > licensed
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > by Oracle that causes legal issues for some of the users. 
> > > > > > > > > > > Once we
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > to JCache 1.1 the won't longer be a big deal.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > However, once we move to 1.1 we need to be sure that we 
> > > > > > > > > > > comply
> > > > > 
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > updated specification.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > Denis
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Dmitry Pavlov <
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > dpavlov....@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Denis,
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > What was improved in JCache 1.1?
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Would it be useful for product to change supported spec.
> > > > > 
> > > > > version?
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > пн, 21 мая 2018 г. в 20:12, Denis Magda 
> > > > > > > > > > > > <dma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Eventually, JCache was relicensed to Apache 2.0 and 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > released
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 1.1
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > version:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jsr107/BC1qKqknzKU
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there anyone interested in upgrading Ignite to the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > version for
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > next release?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8548
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Denis
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Best Regards, Vyacheslav D.
> > > > > > > > 
> 
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to