Alex, please try to run this build plan for your branch https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_JCacheTck11
В Вт, 05/06/2018 в 13:56 +0300, Nikolay Izhikov пишет: > Guys, we had a private talk with Vyacheslav and Dmitriy Pavlov. > Here are its resulst: > > 1. I will create JCache1.1 build plan. > I will be able to run tests with Alex new profile enabled. > > So, Alex can run and share with community tests results both for jcache 1.0 > and jcache 1.1. > > 2. Alex, please, create tickets for a JCache 1.1. issues. > > > В Вт, 05/06/2018 в 13:36 +0300, Vyacheslav Daradur пишет: > > AFAIK TeamCity is not able to create such build-plan on the fly. > > Moreover, we will not be able to test master branch in both profiles > > in this case. > > > > Am I miss something? > > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Vyacheslav, > > > > > > Let's create build plan on TC for this profile. > > > Why we need to merge it in master now? > > > > > > В Вт, 05/06/2018 в 13:29 +0300, Vyacheslav Daradur пишет: > > > > Nikolay, there isn't anything broken in PR. > > > > > > > > The PR is needed to add new build-plan on TC. > > > > > > > > We need tools to check that fixes for 1.1 don't break compatibility > > > > with 1.0. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Кузнецов Алексей Львович > > > > <alkuznetsov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > After Alexander create separate tickets for failed tests, everybody > > > > > is free > > > > > to fix them. > > > > > So we can proceed faster issue resolving. > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, Igniters. > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, I don't understand why we should merge in master something > > > > > > broken. > > > > > > Currently, Ignite is not ready for JCache 1.1. > > > > > > > > > > > > Only change I see in PR is new profile [1]. > > > > > > Is it required to have it to continue jcache 1.1 support > > > > > > implementation? > > > > > > > > > > > > I think Alexandex can proceed with current profile and change it > > > > > > to run > > > > > > tests for JCache 1.1 his own branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > Am I miss something? > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4114 > > > > > > > > > > > > В Вт, 05/06/2018 в 12:50 +0300, Dmitry Pavlov пишет: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alexander, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8687 is 'In > > > > > > > progress'. Is it > > > > > > > expected? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nikolay, have you some time to apply patch, if it passes review? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > вт, 5 июн. 2018 г. в 5:09, Dmitriy Setrakyan > > > > > > > <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Alex! Sounds like a good plan. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Александр Меньшиков > > > > > > > > <sharple...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > Igniters! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have taken a look at the jcache 1.1 spec and TCK. > > > > > > > > > And I can write a brief summary of my plan to solve the task. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have found 6 problems in current master with TCK 1.1 (104 > > > > > > > > > failed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tests). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Of course, we should run this TCK on CI to be absolutely sure > > > > > > > > > we didn't > > > > > > > > > miss something. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So the first step is an adding TCK 1.1 suite to our Team City. > > > > > > > > > I have created sub-task [1] for it and prepared the PR [2]. > > > > > > > > > I need someone with access to merge PR and add suite to Team > > > > > > > > > City. > > > > > > > > > It going to be just a clone of the current jcache-tck suite, > > > > > > > > > but with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the new profile. > > > > > > > > > You can test new profile locally with the following command: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mvn test -P-release,jcache-tck-1.1 -pl :ignite-core -am > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After that, I will start to add sub-task for every problem we > > > > > > > > > have. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nikolay, can you please help me with merging [1] and adding > > > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > suite? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8687 > > > > > > > > > [2]PR: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4114/files > > > > > > > > > [3]CI: > > > > > > > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId= > > > > > > > > > IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=pull/4114/head&tab= > > > > > > > > > buildTypeStatusDiv > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-05-23 14:31 GMT+03:00 Александр Меньшиков > > > > > > > > > <sharple...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Slava. You are right. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-05-23 14:00 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur > > > > > > > > > > <daradu...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Alex! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please have a look at maven profile named "jcache-tck". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe this is what you are looking for. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Александр Меньшиков > > > > > > > > > > > <sharple...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I can do it. As I see we already have JCache > > > > > > > > > > > > TCK tests in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TC. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can I take somewhere settings/script which we are using? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-05-23 2:58 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan > > > > > > > > > > > > <dsetrak...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It will be great if someone in the community would > > > > > > > > > > > > > pick this up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > amount > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of changes are minimal and many of them only have to > > > > > > > > > > > > > do with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clarifying the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > documentation. However, removing JSR 107 license > > > > > > > > > > > > > confusion in 1.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > great for Ignite. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Denis Magda > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dma...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is a list of all changes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jsr107/BC1qKqknzKU > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The primary argument for the migration is a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > license. JCache 1.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > licensed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by Oracle that causes legal issues for some of the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > users. Once we > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > upgrade > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to JCache 1.1 the won't longer be a big deal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, once we move to 1.1 we need to be sure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that we comply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > updated specification. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Dmitry Pavlov < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dpavlov....@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Denis, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What was improved in JCache 1.1? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would it be useful for product to change > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > supported spec. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > version? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > пн, 21 мая 2018 г. в 20:12, Denis Magda > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dma...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eventually, JCache was relicensed to Apache 2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and released > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > version: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jsr107/BC1qKqknzKU > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there anyone interested in upgrading Ignite > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the new > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > version for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > next release? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8548 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, Vyacheslav D. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
