Agree with Nikolay we should create build plan, and we can use this build
plan in developement branch.

Merge to master is not necessary before issue is ready.

вт, 5 июн. 2018 г. в 14:04, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:

> Alex, please try to run this build plan for your branch
>
>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_JCacheTck11
>
> В Вт, 05/06/2018 в 13:56 +0300, Nikolay Izhikov пишет:
> > Guys, we had a private talk with Vyacheslav and Dmitriy Pavlov.
> > Here are its resulst:
> >
> > 1. I will create JCache1.1 build plan.
> > I will be able to run tests with Alex new profile enabled.
> >
> > So, Alex can run and share with community tests results both for jcache
> 1.0 and jcache 1.1.
> >
> > 2. Alex, please, create tickets for a JCache 1.1. issues.
> >
> >
> > В Вт, 05/06/2018 в 13:36 +0300, Vyacheslav Daradur пишет:
> > > AFAIK TeamCity is not able to create such build-plan on the fly.
> > > Moreover, we will not be able to test master branch in both profiles
> > > in this case.
> > >
> > > Am I miss something?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > Vyacheslav,
> > > >
> > > > Let's create build plan on TC for this profile.
> > > > Why we need to merge it in master now?
> > > >
> > > > В Вт, 05/06/2018 в 13:29 +0300, Vyacheslav Daradur пишет:
> > > > > Nikolay, there isn't anything broken in PR.
> > > > >
> > > > > The PR is needed to add new build-plan on TC.
> > > > >
> > > > > We need tools to check that fixes for 1.1 don't break
> compatibility with 1.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Кузнецов Алексей Львович
> > > > > <alkuznetsov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > After Alexander create separate tickets for failed tests,
> everybody is free
> > > > > > to fix them.
> > > > > > So we can proceed faster issue resolving.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello, Igniters.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Actually, I don't understand why we should merge in master
> something
> > > > > > > broken.
> > > > > > > Currently, Ignite is not ready for JCache 1.1.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Only change I see in PR is new profile [1].
> > > > > > > Is it required to have it to continue jcache 1.1 support
> implementation?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think Alexandex can proceed with current profile and change
> it  to run
> > > > > > > tests for JCache 1.1 his own branch.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Am I miss something?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4114
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > В Вт, 05/06/2018 в 12:50 +0300, Dmitry Pavlov пишет:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Alexander,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8687 is 'In
> progress'. Is it
> > > > > > > > expected?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Nikolay, have you some time to apply patch, if it passes
> review?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > вт, 5 июн. 2018 г. в 5:09, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> dsetrak...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks, Alex! Sounds like a good plan.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Александр Меньшиков
> > > > > > > > > <sharple...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > > > Igniters!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I have taken a look at the jcache 1.1 spec and TCK.
> > > > > > > > > > And I can write a brief summary of my plan to solve the
> task.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I have found 6 problems in current master with TCK 1.1
> (104 failed
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > tests).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Of course, we should run this TCK on CI to be absolutely
> sure we didn't
> > > > > > > > > > miss something.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So the first step is an adding TCK 1.1 suite to our Team
> City.
> > > > > > > > > > I have created sub-task [1] for it and prepared the PR
> [2].
> > > > > > > > > > I need someone with access to merge PR and add suite to
> Team City.
> > > > > > > > > > It going to be just a clone of the current jcache-tck
> suite, but with
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > using
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > the new profile.
> > > > > > > > > > You can test new profile locally with the following
> command:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > mvn test -P-release,jcache-tck-1.1 -pl :ignite-core -am
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > After that, I will start to add sub-task for every
> problem we have.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Nikolay, can you please help me with merging [1] and
> adding to the
> > > > > > > > > > suite?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [1]JIRA:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8687
> > > > > > > > > > [2]PR: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4114/files
> > > > > > > > > > [3]CI:
> > > > > > > > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=
> > > > > > > > > >
> IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=pull/4114/head&tab=
> > > > > > > > > > buildTypeStatusDiv
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2018-05-23 14:31 GMT+03:00 Александр Меньшиков <
> sharple...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Slava. You are right.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2018-05-23 14:00 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <
> daradu...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Alex!
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Please have a look at maven profile named
> "jcache-tck".
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I believe this is what you are looking for.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Александр Меньшиков
> > > > > > > > > > > > <sharple...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I can do it. As I see we already have
> JCache TCK tests in
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > TC.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Can I take somewhere settings/script which we are
> using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-05-23 2:58 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> dsetrak...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > :
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It will be great if someone in the community
> would pick this up.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > amount
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of changes are minimal and many of them only
> have to do with
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > clarifying the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > documentation. However, removing JSR 107 license
> confusion in 1.1
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > great for Ignite.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > D.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Denis Magda <
> dma...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is a list of all changes:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jsr107/BC1qKqknzKU
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The primary argument for the migration is a
> license. JCache 1.0
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > licensed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by Oracle that causes legal issues for some of
> the users. Once we
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to JCache 1.1 the won't longer be a big deal.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, once we move to 1.1 we need to be
> sure that we comply
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > updated specification.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Denis
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Dmitry Pavlov
> <
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > dpavlov....@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Denis,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What was improved in JCache 1.1?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would it be useful for product to change
> supported spec.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > version?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > пн, 21 мая 2018 г. в 20:12, Denis Magda <
> dma...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eventually, JCache was relicensed to
> Apache 2.0 and released
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 1.1
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > version:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jsr107/BC1qKqknzKU
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there anyone interested in upgrading
> Ignite to the new
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > version for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > next release?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8548
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Denis
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, Vyacheslav D.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >

Reply via email to