Andrey, Dmitry, If we have a practice of formatting a code before merge by committer then it is already much better. But do we have such a practice?
As for me personally. I have not felt much discomfort with abbreviations. I already used them extensively. Even "cctx", "ccfg" which are not mandatory today. пт, 2 нояб. 2018 г. в 10:58, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com>: > Hi Ivan, > > provided that committer has installed ignite-abbrev-plugin it is not a big > deal to abbreviate common words before a merge. > > I had the same impression about abbreviations when I came to the project: > "all other development world tends to expose as much meaning as it is > humanly possible in code, but Ignite has abbreviations seemed to hide this > meaning". But later I've used to most common abbreviations, like ctx, and > I always understand that this implies context. > > Sincerely, > Dmitriy Pavlov > > пт, 2 нояб. 2018 г. в 10:21, Andrey Kuznetsov <stku...@gmail.com>: > > > Ivan, I agree with you: some our code style rules are really uncommon. > > > > As for one-time contributions, if somebody decides to make a contribution > > to some project, it's ok to adopt that project rules. Moreover, reviewing > > committer can silently fix minor code style issues himself upon merge. > > > > пт, 2 нояб. 2018 г. в 10:08, Павлухин Иван <vololo...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Andrey, Yakov, > > > > > > Actually my concert is more about one-time contributions. I imagine > > > the following. Someone finds a bug a decides to contribute a fix. > > > I think it is quite common scenario in Open Source. > > > He creates a PR and awaits a review. I think that a smooth and fast > > > review process will encourage for new contributions. But if the review > > > process is not such the contributor can simply give up. > > > > > > P.S. In my mind there are quite uncommon code style rules in Ignite > > > project. But it is definitely not for that topic. I imagine some "New > > > Contributor Survey". > > > > > > чт, 1 нояб. 2018 г. в 18:28, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > Ivan I removed "lic" from the list. Thanks for catch! > > > > > > > > Agree with Andrey. After several code reviews newcomers will get used > > to > > > > abbreviations. > > > > > > > > Andrey, try searching for "fut" and make sure to have "Word" checked. > > You > > > > will see plenty of usages. "f" is also ok for future in case it does > > not > > > > bring confusion and does not hurt readability. > > > > > > > > Let's keep using abbreviations and treat them as mandatory > requirement. > > > > This is important for keeping our codebase consistent and tidy. > > > > > > > > --Yakov > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Andrey Kuznetsov. > > > -- Best regards, Ivan Pavlukhin
