I recently found, that control.sh is broken since 2.8.0 a little bit. Script returns always 0 code, despite the fact, that CommandHandler returns code correctly.
Here is the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13328, patch is available. пт, 31 июл. 2020 г. в 14:09, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>: > Ivan, > > IGNITE-13306 cherry-picked to 2.9 > > пт, 31 июл. 2020 г. в 13:43, Ivan Rakov <ivan.glu...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi Alex, > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13306 is merged to master. > > Can you please cherry-pick to 2.9? > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 7:42 PM Ilya Kasnacheev < > ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hello! > >> > >> I don't think that IGNITE-13006 > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13006> is a blocker in > any > >> way. It is a good candidate for 3.0. > >> > >> ignite-spring will work with 4.x Spring as well as 5.x and the user is > >> free > >> to bump Spring version. I think bumping this dependency explicitly is > >> infeasible since it may break existing code. > >> > >> Regards, > >> -- > >> Ilya Kasnacheev > >> > >> > >> ср, 22 июл. 2020 г. в 10:22, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>: > >> > >> > Guys, > >> > > >> > We are in code-freeze phase now. I've moved almost all non-blocker > >> > unresolved tickets from 2.9 to the next release. If you think that > >> > some ticket is a blocker and should be included into 2.9 release, > please > >> > write a note in this thread. > >> > > >> > There are some tickets with "blocker" priority targeted to 2.9, some > of > >> > them in "open" state and still unassigned, and I'm not sure we need > all > >> of > >> > these tickets in 2.9: > >> > > >> > IGNITE-13006 [1] (Apache Ignite spring libs upgrade from version 4x to > >> > spring 5.2 version or later) - Is it really a blocker for 2.9 release? > >> If > >> > yes, can somebody help with resolving this ticket? > >> > > >> > IGNITE-11942 [2] (IGFS and Hadoop Accelerator Discontinuation) - > ticket > >> in > >> > "Patch available" state. There is a thread on dev-list related to this > >> > ticket ([6]), but as far as I understand we still don't have consensus > >> > about version for this patch (2.9, 2.10, 3.0). > >> > > >> > IGNITE-12489 [3] (Error during purges by expiration: Unknown page > type) > >> - > >> > perhaps issue is already resolved by some related tickets, there is > >> still > >> > no reproducer, no additional details and no work in progress. I > propose > >> to > >> > move this ticket to the next release. > >> > > >> > IGNITE-12911 [4] (B+Tree Corrupted exception when using a key > extracted > >> > from a BinaryObject value object --- and SQL enabled) - ticket in > "Patch > >> > available" state, but there is no activity since May 2020. Anton > >> > Kalashnikov, Ilya Kasnacheev, do we have any updates on this ticket? > Is > >> it > >> > still in progress? > >> > > >> > IGNITE-12553 [5] ([IEP-35] public Java metric API) - since the new > >> metrics > >> > framework is already released in 2.8 and it's still marked with > >> > @IgniteExperemental annotation, I think this ticket is not a blocker. > I > >> > propose to change the ticket priority and move it to the next release. > >> > > >> > > >> > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13006 > >> > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11942 > >> > [3]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12489 > >> > [4]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12911 > >> > [5]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12553 > >> > [6]: > >> > > >> > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Complete-Discontinuation-of-IGFS-and-Hadoop-Accelerator-td42282.html > >> > > >> > пт, 17 июл. 2020 г. в 11:50, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>: > >> > > >> >> Ivan, > >> >> > >> >> Merged to 2.9. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks > >> >> > >> >> пт, 17 июл. 2020 г. в 01:35, Ivan Rakov <ivan.glu...@gmail.com>: > >> >> > >> >>> Alex, > >> >>> > >> >>> Tracing is merged to master: > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13060 > >> >>> > >> >>> Can you please port it to 2.9? > >> >>> For you convenience, there's PR versus 2.9 with conflicts resolved: > >> >>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8046/files > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Best Regards, > >> >>> Ivan Rakov > >> >>> > >> >>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:33 PM Alex Plehanov < > >> plehanov.a...@gmail.com> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> Ivan, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Looks like master is broken after IGNITE-13246 (but everything is > ok > >> in > >> >>>> 2.9 > >> >>>> branch) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> ср, 15 июл. 2020 г. в 18:54, Alex Plehanov < > plehanov.a...@gmail.com > >> >: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > Zhenya, Ivan, > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > I've cherry-picked IGNITE-13229 and IGNITE-13246 to ignite-2.9 > >> branch. > >> >>>> > Thank you. > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > ср, 15 июл. 2020 г. в 18:31, Ivan Bessonov < > bessonov...@gmail.com > >> >: > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> >> Guys, > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> can you please backport > >> >>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13246 > >> >>>> >> to ignite-2.9? Me and Alexey Kuznetsov really want these new > >> events > >> >>>> in > >> >>>> >> release. > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> This time I prepared PR with resolved conflicts: > >> >>>> >> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8042 > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> Thank you! > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> вт, 14 июл. 2020 г. в 19:39, Zhenya Stanilovsky > >> >>>> >> <arzamas...@mail.ru.invalid > >> >>>> >> >: > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > Alex, i also suggest to merge this > >> >>>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13229 too, > >> GridClient > >> >>>> >> > leakage and further TC OOM preventing. > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > >Ivan, > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> >> > >It was already in release scope as discussed in this thread. > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> >> > >вт, 14 июл. 2020 г. в 14:31, Ivan Rakov < > >> ivan.glu...@gmail.com > >> >>>> >: > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> >> > >> Hi, > >> >>>> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> > >> We are still waiting for a final review of Tracing > >> >>>> functionality [1] > >> >>>> >> > until > >> >>>> >> > >> the end of tomorrow (July 15). > >> >>>> >> > >> We anticipate that it will be merged to Ignite master no > >> later > >> >>>> than > >> >>>> >> July > >> >>>> >> > >> 16. > >> >>>> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> > >> Sorry for being a bit late here. Alex P., can you include > [1] > >> >>>> to the > >> >>>> >> > >> release scope? > >> >>>> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> > >> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13060 > >> >>>> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> > >> -- > >> >>>> >> > >> Best Regards, > >> >>>> >> > >> Ivan Rakov > >> >>>> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> > >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 6:16 AM Alexey Kuznetsov < > >> >>>> >> > akuznet...@gridgain.com > > >> >>>> >> > >> wrote: > >> >>>> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> > >>> Alex, > >> >>>> >> > >>> > >> >>>> >> > >>> Can you cherry-pick to Ignite 2.9 this issue: > >> >>>> >> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13246 ? > >> >>>> >> > >>> > >> >>>> >> > >>> This issue is about BASELINE events and it is very useful > >> for > >> >>>> >> > notification > >> >>>> >> > >>> external tools about changes in baseline. > >> >>>> >> > >>> > >> >>>> >> > >>> Thank you! > >> >>>> >> > >>> > >> >>>> >> > >>> --- > >> >>>> >> > >>> Alexey Kuznetsov > >> >>>> >> > >>> > >> >>>> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> -- > >> >>>> >> Sincerely yours, > >> >>>> >> Ivan Bessonov > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> > > > -- Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
