Hi Everyone,
I looked at the documentation tasks for Ignite 2.9 [1] and noticed that
some of them were being worked on. I'll take a look at the other tickets
(unassigned or assigned to me). I hope I'll have enough time to finish
them by the time of the release.
-Artem
[1]:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.9#ApacheIgnite2.9-Documentationtasksforimportantfeaturesimplementedin2.9
On 06.08.2020 15:05, Alex Plehanov wrote:
Ivan,
Thank you. We've got performance drop on our benchmarks too.
We are trying to bisect changes and find problematic commit now.
чт, 6 авг. 2020 г. в 14:51, Ivan Artiukhov <m.sh...@gmail.com>:
Hello,
I've compared performances of 2.9 and 2.8.1 using Yardstick and some
atomic/transactional/SQL operations. Ignite 2.9 is up to 7% slower in my
configuration. Please see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13337 for
details. Is this performance drop a blocker for 2.9 release?
--
Regards,
Ivan Artiukhov
чт, 6 авг. 2020 г. в 11:10, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>:
I recently found, that control.sh is broken since 2.8.0 a little bit.
Script returns always 0 code, despite the fact, that CommandHandler
returns
code correctly.
Here is the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13328,
patch
is available.
пт, 31 июл. 2020 г. в 14:09, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>:
Ivan,
IGNITE-13306 cherry-picked to 2.9
пт, 31 июл. 2020 г. в 13:43, Ivan Rakov <ivan.glu...@gmail.com>:
Hi Alex,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13306 is merged to
master.
Can you please cherry-pick to 2.9?
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 7:42 PM Ilya Kasnacheev <
ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello!
I don't think that IGNITE-13006
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13006> is a blocker
in
any
way. It is a good candidate for 3.0.
ignite-spring will work with 4.x Spring as well as 5.x and the user
is
free
to bump Spring version. I think bumping this dependency explicitly
is
infeasible since it may break existing code.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
ср, 22 июл. 2020 г. в 10:22, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com
:
Guys,
We are in code-freeze phase now. I've moved almost all non-blocker
unresolved tickets from 2.9 to the next release. If you think that
some ticket is a blocker and should be included into 2.9 release,
please
write a note in this thread.
There are some tickets with "blocker" priority targeted to 2.9,
some
of
them in "open" state and still unassigned, and I'm not sure we
need
all
of
these tickets in 2.9:
IGNITE-13006 [1] (Apache Ignite spring libs upgrade from version
4x
to
spring 5.2 version or later) - Is it really a blocker for 2.9
release?
If
yes, can somebody help with resolving this ticket?
IGNITE-11942 [2] (IGFS and Hadoop Accelerator Discontinuation) -
ticket
in
"Patch available" state. There is a thread on dev-list related to
this
ticket ([6]), but as far as I understand we still don't have
consensus
about version for this patch (2.9, 2.10, 3.0).
IGNITE-12489 [3] (Error during purges by expiration: Unknown page
type)
-
perhaps issue is already resolved by some related tickets, there
is
still
no reproducer, no additional details and no work in progress. I
propose
to
move this ticket to the next release.
IGNITE-12911 [4] (B+Tree Corrupted exception when using a key
extracted
from a BinaryObject value object --- and SQL enabled) - ticket in
"Patch
available" state, but there is no activity since May 2020. Anton
Kalashnikov, Ilya Kasnacheev, do we have any updates on this
ticket?
Is
it
still in progress?
IGNITE-12553 [5] ([IEP-35] public Java metric API) - since the new
metrics
framework is already released in 2.8 and it's still marked with
@IgniteExperemental annotation, I think this ticket is not a
blocker.
I
propose to change the ticket priority and move it to the next
release.
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13006
[2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11942
[3]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12489
[4]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12911
[5]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12553
[6]:
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Complete-Discontinuation-of-IGFS-and-Hadoop-Accelerator-td42282.html
пт, 17 июл. 2020 г. в 11:50, Alex Plehanov <
plehanov.a...@gmail.com
:
Ivan,
Merged to 2.9.
Thanks
пт, 17 июл. 2020 г. в 01:35, Ivan Rakov <ivan.glu...@gmail.com>:
Alex,
Tracing is merged to master:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13060
Can you please port it to 2.9?
For you convenience, there's PR versus 2.9 with conflicts
resolved:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8046/files
--
Best Regards,
Ivan Rakov
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:33 PM Alex Plehanov <
plehanov.a...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Ivan,
Looks like master is broken after IGNITE-13246 (but everything
is
ok
in
2.9
branch)
ср, 15 июл. 2020 г. в 18:54, Alex Plehanov <
plehanov.a...@gmail.com
:
Zhenya, Ivan,
I've cherry-picked IGNITE-13229 and IGNITE-13246 to
ignite-2.9
branch.
Thank you.
ср, 15 июл. 2020 г. в 18:31, Ivan Bessonov <
bessonov...@gmail.com
:
Guys,
can you please backport
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13246
to ignite-2.9? Me and Alexey Kuznetsov really want these new
events
in
release.
This time I prepared PR with resolved conflicts:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8042
Thank you!
вт, 14 июл. 2020 г. в 19:39, Zhenya Stanilovsky
<arzamas...@mail.ru.invalid
:
Alex, i also suggest to merge this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13229 too,
GridClient
leakage and further TC OOM preventing.
Ivan,
It was already in release scope as discussed in this
thread.
вт, 14 июл. 2020 г. в 14:31, Ivan Rakov <
ivan.glu...@gmail.com
:
Hi,
We are still waiting for a final review of Tracing
functionality [1]
until
the end of tomorrow (July 15).
We anticipate that it will be merged to Ignite master
no
later
than
July
16.
Sorry for being a bit late here. Alex P., can you
include
[1]
to the
release scope?
[1]:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13060
--
Best Regards,
Ivan Rakov
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 6:16 AM Alexey Kuznetsov <
akuznet...@gridgain.com >
wrote:
Alex,
Can you cherry-pick to Ignite 2.9 this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13246 ?
This issue is about BASELINE events and it is very
useful
for
notification
external tools about changes in baseline.
Thank you!
---
Alexey Kuznetsov
--
Sincerely yours,
Ivan Bessonov
--
Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
