Val,

I remember some of us wanted to rework the transactional API. Is it still
relevant?

Also, I would add the native image feature of GraalVM to the scope of the
release. Presently, even Java *thin* clients fail if an app is compiled and
started as the native image. Turns out that the thin client triggers some
logic of the BinaryMarshaller that attempts to load classes dynamically
which crashes the native application. So, I don't have any other choice but
to use our legacy REST APIs to query records from Ignite. Not the best
choice, right :)

GraalVM's native image generation capability is a cornerstone feature for
modern Java applications deployed in serverless environments and powered by
contemporary frameworks such as Micronaut and Quarkus. That's the nearest
future and I would encourage us to support the native image feature at
least for the thin clients in Ignite 3.0. It might be much more difficult
to enable the support for the thick clients but that waits.


-
Denis


On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:34 PM Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Saikat,
>
> Absolutely, we should revisit the existing APIs and decide which we want to
> keep as-is, which we want to remove, and which we want to rework and
> modernize. 3.0 is a rare opportunity to do such a cleanup :)
>
> -Val
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 6:54 PM Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Val,
> >
> > Thank you for sharing the page and your efforts in compiling the features
> > list, I am thinking since it is a major version release then shall we
> > include a section for deprecated features and add changes as mentioned in
> > our Apache Ignite 3.0 Wishlist
> >
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0+Wishlist
> >
> > Regards,
> > Saikat
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:25 AM Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Val!
> > > Thanks for your efforts on this endeavour!
> > >
> > >
> > > I would like to suggest deliveries changes in Apache Ignite 3.0:
> > >  — modularised  binary delivery — single minimal binary for starting
> > > Ignite and all other modules and parts of the project (benchmarks,
> > > examples, etc.) packed in their own binary which can be added via
> custom
> > > dependency management tool (i.e. modules.sh)
> > >  — same distribution for RPM and DEB packages but with modules packed
> as
> > > separate ones (PHP for example)
> > >  — separate thin client release cycle with custom versioning
> > > Possibly, we can we add additional section to the document you
> introduced
> > > for this part.
> > >
> > > Also, it seems that full JDK11 support (including building) would be a
> > > huge milestone and a sign of healthy modern project that tends to be on
> > the
> > > verge of mainstream technologies and not the stockpile of legacy
> > leftovers
> > > (fully support Iliya in removing all that was deprecated and/or marked
> as
> > > unused anymore).
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 8 Aug 2020, at 02:00, Valentin Kulichenko <
> > > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Igniters,
> > > >
> > > > I've created the page:
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0
> > > >
> > > > That's not everything I have in mind, but I believe there is already
> a
> > > lot
> > > > to talk about :)
> > > >
> > > > Please take a look let me know if you have any concerns, objections,
> or
> > > > questions. Once we reach the consensus on the proposed changes, I
> will
> > > > start creating tickets in Jira and a more detailed plan.
> > > >
> > > > -Val
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 6:28 PM Saikat Maitra <
> saikat.mai...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Denis, Val
> > > >>
> > > >> Thank you for your reply and really appreciate it. It will be very
> > cool
> > > to
> > > >> be able to connect and plan release together and learn more about
> > > Ignite in
> > > >> the process :)
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards
> > > >> Saikat
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 7:12 PM Valentin Kulichenko <
> > > >> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Saikat,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> That surely is a great idea. We will work together with Denis on
> > > setting
> > > >>> this up in the nearest future.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -Val
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:21 AM Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Saikat,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Fully support your idea on a virtual meetup! Once Val collects and
> > > >>> outlines
> > > >>>> the main changes with directions on wiki, we’ll go ahead and
> > schedule
> > > >> the
> > > >>>> meetup to talk things out in a bit more detail. We’ll use our new
> > > >> Virtual
> > > >>>> Ignite Meetup group for that inviting both Ignite contributors and
> > > >>>> application developers.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Denis
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Thursday, August 6, 2020, Saikat Maitra <
> saikat.mai...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Hi Valentin
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thank you for sharing and starting the thread. I am thinking if
> it
> > > >> will
> > > >>>> be
> > > >>>>> a good idea to have a virtual meet setup to discuss on the
> release
> > > >>>>> planning.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> It will help to learn more individual features to be added and
> also
> > > >> to
> > > >>>>> understand about features that have been deprecated and scheduled
> > for
> > > >>>>> removal in Ignite 3.0 release. Also it will help community member
> > to
> > > >>>>> connect in real time and ask questions and share feedback.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Regards,
> > > >>>>> Saikat
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 3:51 AM Ilya Kasnacheev <
> > > >>>> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Hello!
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I hope to see Apache Ignite release 3.0 as API trimming release.
> > > >> Let
> > > >>> us
> > > >>>>>> correct external and internal APIs for which we have better
> ideas
> > > >>> now,
> > > >>>> as
> > > >>>>>> well as remove old and deprecated code.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> We may also introduce new configuration mechanisms and
> user-facing
> > > >>> API
> > > >>>>>> (such as cache-less native SQL queries), but this we could
> > > >> prototype
> > > >>>>> before
> > > >>>>>> starting the 3.0 task.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I will advise against targeting large new features at 3.0. They
> > can
> > > >>> be
> > > >>>>>> added in subsequent point releases, whereas we can't really
> remove
> > > >> or
> > > >>>>>> remodel stuff in point releases.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Regards,
> > > >>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> чт, 6 авг. 2020 г. в 03:54, Valentin Kulichenko <
> > > >>>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com>:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Igniters,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I would like to kick off a discussion regarding Ignite 3.0.
> > > >> Ignite
> > > >>>> 2.0
> > > >>>>>>> exists for more than 3 years now and we've already collected a
> > > >>>>>> significant
> > > >>>>>>> list [1] of changes that we would like to have, but cannot
> > > >>> implement
> > > >>>>>>> without breaking compatibility.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I think it's time to start planning for the next major release
> > > >> and
> > > >>>>>>> discussing what should be included. I've already gathered some
> > > >>>>>> information
> > > >>>>>>> and feedback, and have some thoughts on how to approach this.
> In
> > > >>> the
> > > >>>>> next
> > > >>>>>>> few days, I will put everything into a Wiki page and will share
> > > >> it
> > > >>>> once
> > > >>>>>>> this is done. Stay tuned!
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I'm willing to drive the 3.0 activities going forward as well.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> In the meantime, if there are any immediate thoughts or ideas,
> > > >>> please
> > > >>>>>> feel
> > > >>>>>>> free to join the thread and share them.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> [1]
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/
> > > >>>>> Apache+Ignite+3.0+Wishlist
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Regards,
> > > >>>>>>> Val
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> -
> > > >>>> Denis
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to