+1 Causeway Thx all! ________________________________ De: Dan Haywood <[email protected]> Enviado: sábado, 16 de julio de 2022 6:53 Para: dev <[email protected]> Asunto: Re: [VOTE] change the name of the framework to "Causeway"
+1 from me, too. On Sat, 16 Jul 2022, 05:32 Andi Huber, <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Dan! > > My vote: +1 > (change the framework's name to "Causeway") > > Cheers Andi > > On 2022/07/15 15:50:10 Dan Haywood wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > First, let me update everyone on where we've got to on the initiative to > > rename the framework: > > > > * on 24th May we kicked off a vote [1] on the principle of changing the > > name of the framework, with 3 candidate names > > * on 13th June I closed that vote [2] with "Alma" and "Causeway" both > > receiving very similar numbers of votes ("Causeway" slightly edging it > > after the dust had settled) > > * at the same time I invited folks to perform the product name search for > > both, and to provide logo ideas for both [3]. > > > > Since then (over the last 4 weeks) we've had a good number of logo ideas > > for "Causeway". As it is my particular favorite, I took the time to > > perform a product name search [3]; I didn't see any issues. > > > > For "Alma", we have had a limited number of logo suggestions, and no-one > > has completed the product name search. > > > > Given that more enthusiasm has been shown for moving to "Causeway", I > > suggest this is the way to go. > > > > ~~~~~~ > > > > We now need to run another vote to obtain a mandate for this. Only > > committers/PMC members need vote this time. > > > > [+1] change the framework's name to "Causeway" > > [+0] yes we should change the name, but I don't want to lend my vote > to > > this particular name > > [-0] no, I don't think we should change the name, but I don't want to > > block this change > > [-1] no, don't change the framework's name at all, or at least not to > > this name. > > > > If you're a PMC member and strongly feel that the name should change > > instead to "Alma", then you should probably vote -1. However, I would > ask > > that you complete the product name search similar to [3] if that's the > > case. Please don't vote against without completing the name > > search, otherwise we end up not being able to move forward with either > > option. > > > > In theory only 72 hours is required for this vote, but as it's so > > important, I again intend to keep the vote alive, I suggest for a week. > > > > Thanks > > Dan > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/k5bfzho5tpql2cpk16popp9d6x8rghod > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/srpdmolwb99qwj0fboks0yodqgp50zov > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-201 > > >
