Forwarding this from Rob - I believe he meant to post it to dev as a vote. Thx
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Robert Matthews <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 at 14:41 Subject: Re: [VOTE] change the name of the framework to "Causeway" To: Dan Haywood <[email protected]> +1 Go with Causeway Rob PS You don't often have to deal with 1s complement these days. On 01/08/2022 13:48, Dan Haywood wrote: > Hi folks, > > This vote (seeking approval to change the name of the framework to > "Causeway") has been running for 2 weeks now, and I'd like to close it > in the next day or so. > > Currently we are at +5 to confirm (Andi, Oscar, Dan, Joerg, Johan). > > But in case anyone missed this vote, I'm bcc'ing the PMC members who > engaged in the earlier vote. Just to repeat the initial words I put in > the initial post: > > * For "Alma", we have had a limited number of logo suggestions, and > no-one has completed the product name search > * More enthusiasm has been shown for moving to "Causeway" [1], this is > why I've suggested it as the way to go. > > Thus the vote is: > > [+1] change the framework's name to "Causeway" > [+0] yes we should change the name, but I don't want to lend my vote > to this particular name > [-0] no, I don't think we should change the name, but I don't want > to block this change > [-1] no, don't change the framework's name at all, or at least not > to this name. > > If you're a PMC member and strongly feel that the name should change > instead to "Alma", then you should probably vote -1. However, I would > ask that you complete the product name search similar to [2] if that's > the case. Please don't vote against without completing the name > search, otherwise we end up not being able to move forward with either > option. > > Thanks all > Dan > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ISIS/Apache+Isis+rename+-+next+steps > < https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ISIS/Apache+Isis+rename+-+next+steps> > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-201 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-201> > > > > On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 13:32, Johan Doornenbal <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > +1 Causeway for me too > > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, > > Johan Doornenbal > > > M 06 227 666 28 > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > www.yodo.nl <http://www.yodo.nl> > > > Griene Daam 7 > > 9084 DG Goutum > > > Op ma 1 aug. 2022 om 12:14 schreef Rade, Joerg / Kuehne + Nagel / > Ham MI-DD > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > > +1 Causeway > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: ?scar Bou Bou via dev <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juli 2022 16:08 > > An: dev <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Betreff: RE: [VOTE] change the name of the framework to "Causeway" > > > > EXTERNAL EMAIL > > > > +1 Causeway > > > > Thx all! > > ________________________________ > > De: Dan Haywood <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Enviado: sábado, 16 de julio de 2022 6:53 > > Para: dev <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Asunto: Re: [VOTE] change the name of the framework to "Causeway" > > > > +1 from me, too. > > > > On Sat, 16 Jul 2022, 05:32 Andi Huber, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > Thanks Dan! > > > > > > My vote: +1 > > > (change the framework's name to "Causeway") > > > > > > Cheers Andi > > > > > > On 2022/07/15 15:50:10 Dan Haywood wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > First, let me update everyone on where we've got to on the > > > > initiative to rename the framework: > > > > > > > > * on 24th May we kicked off a vote [1] on the principle of > changing > > > > the name of the framework, with 3 candidate names > > > > * on 13th June I closed that vote [2] with "Alma" and "Causeway" > > > > both receiving very similar numbers of votes ("Causeway" slightly > > > > edging it after the dust had settled) > > > > * at the same time I invited folks to perform the product name > > > > search for both, and to provide logo ideas for both [3]. > > > > > > > > Since then (over the last 4 weeks) we've had a good number of > logo > > > > ideas for "Causeway". As it is my particular favorite, I > took the > > > > time to perform a product name search [3]; I didn't see any > issues. > > > > > > > > For "Alma", we have had a limited number of logo suggestions, and > > > > no-one has completed the product name search. > > > > > > > > Given that more enthusiasm has been shown for moving to > "Causeway", > > > > I suggest this is the way to go. > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~ > > > > > > > > We now need to run another vote to obtain a mandate for > this. Only > > > > committers/PMC members need vote this time. > > > > > > > > [+1] change the framework's name to "Causeway" > > > > [+0] yes we should change the name, but I don't want to > lend my > > > > vote > > > to > > > > this particular name > > > > [-0] no, I don't think we should change the name, but I don't > > > > want to block this change > > > > [-1] no, don't change the framework's name at all, or at least > > > > not to this name. > > > > > > > > If you're a PMC member and strongly feel that the name should > change > > > > instead to "Alma", then you should probably vote -1. However, I > > > > would > > > ask > > > > that you complete the product name search similar to [3] if > that's > > > > the case. Please don't vote against without completing the name > > > > search, otherwise we end up not being able to move forward with > > > > either option. > > > > > > > > In theory only 72 hours is required for this vote, but as it's so > > > > important, I again intend to keep the vote alive, I suggest > for a week. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/k5bfzho5tpql2cpk16popp9d6x8rghod > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/k5bfzho5tpql2cpk16popp9d6x8rghod> > > > > [2] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/srpdmolwb99qwj0fboks0yodqgp50zov > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/srpdmolwb99qwj0fboks0yodqgp50zov> > > > > [3] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-201 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-201> > > > > > > > > > > > Kühne + Nagel (AG & Co.) KG > > Rechtsform: Kommanditgesellschaft, Bremen HRA 21928, USt-IdNr.: DE > > 812773878. > > Geschäftsleitung Kühne + Nagel (AG & Co.) KG: Holger Ketz > (Vors.), Simon > > Bitter, Martin Brinkmann, Lars-Olof Grün, Matthias Knicky, Axel > Krichel, > > Johannes Trimborn, Lars Wedel. > > Persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin: Kühne & Nagel A.G., Rechtsform: > > Aktiengesellschaft nach luxemburgischem Recht, HR-Nr.: B 18745, > > Geschäftsführendes Verwaltungsratsmitglied: Karl Gernandt. > > Geschäftsleitung Region Europa: Jens Drewes (Vors.), Ants > Anupold, Dominic > > Edmonds, Thierry Held, Richard Huhn, Jan-Hendrik Köstergarten, > Nicholas > > Minde, André Schiffer, Heiko Schuhmacher. > > > > Wir arbeiten ausschließlich auf Grundlage der Allgemeinen Deutschen > > Spediteurbedingungen 2017 (ADSp 2017). Hinweis: Die ADSp 2017 > weichen in > > Ziffer 23 hinsichtlich des Haftungshöchstbetrages für > Güterschäden (§ 431 > > HGB) vom Gesetz ab, indem sie die Haftung bei multimodalen > Transporten > > unter Einschluss einer Seebeförderung und bei unbekanntem > Schadenort auf 2 > > SZR/kg und im Übrigen die Regelhaftung von 8,33 SZR/kg zusätzlich > auf 1,25 > > Millionen Euro je Schadenfall sowie 2,5 Millionen Euro je > Schadenereignis, > > mindestens aber 2 SZR/kg, beschränken. Die ADSp sind auf unserer > Webseite > > als Download erhältlich. Auf Anfrage senden wir Ihnen diese auch > gerne zu. > > >
