Hi folks,

This vote (seeking approval to change the name of the framework to
"Causeway") has been running for 2 weeks now, and I'd like to close it in
the next day or so.

Currently we are at +5 to confirm (Andi, Oscar, Dan, Joerg, Johan).

But in case anyone missed this vote, I'm bcc'ing the PMC members who
engaged in the earlier vote. Just to repeat the initial words I put in the
initial post:

* For "Alma", we have had a limited number of logo suggestions, and no-one
has completed the product name search
* More enthusiasm has been shown for moving to "Causeway" [1], this is why
I've suggested it as the way to go.

Thus the vote is:

   [+1] change the framework's name to "Causeway"
   [+0] yes we should change the name, but I don't want to lend my vote to
this particular name
   [-0] no, I don't think we should change the name, but I don't want to
block this change
   [-1] no, don't change the framework's name at all, or at least not to
this name.

If you're a PMC member and strongly feel that the name should change
instead to "Alma", then you should probably vote -1.  However, I would ask
that you complete the product name search similar to [2] if that's the
case. Please don't vote against without completing the name
search, otherwise we end up not being able to move forward with either
option.

Thanks all
Dan

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ISIS/Apache+Isis+rename+-+next+steps

[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-201



On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 13:32, Johan Doornenbal <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 Causeway for me too
>
> Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet,
>
> Johan Doornenbal
>
>
> M 06 227 666 28
>
> [email protected] <[email protected]>
>
> www.yodo.nl
>
>
> Griene Daam 7
>
> 9084 DG Goutum
>
>
> Op ma 1 aug. 2022 om 12:14 schreef Rade, Joerg / Kuehne + Nagel / Ham MI-DD
> <[email protected]>:
>
> > +1 Causeway
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: ?scar Bou Bou via dev <[email protected]>
> > Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juli 2022 16:08
> > An: dev <[email protected]>
> > Betreff: RE: [VOTE] change the name of the framework to "Causeway"
> >
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL
> >
> > +1 Causeway
> >
> > Thx all!
> > ________________________________
> > De: Dan Haywood <[email protected]>
> > Enviado: sábado, 16 de julio de 2022 6:53
> > Para: dev <[email protected]>
> > Asunto: Re: [VOTE] change the name of the framework to "Causeway"
> >
> > +1 from me, too.
> >
> > On Sat, 16 Jul 2022, 05:32 Andi Huber, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Dan!
> > >
> > > My vote: +1
> > > (change the framework's name to "Causeway")
> > >
> > > Cheers Andi
> > >
> > > On 2022/07/15 15:50:10 Dan Haywood wrote:
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > First, let me update everyone on where we've got to on the
> > > > initiative to rename the framework:
> > > >
> > > > * on 24th May we kicked off a vote [1] on the principle of changing
> > > > the name of the framework, with 3 candidate names
> > > > * on 13th June I closed that vote [2] with "Alma" and "Causeway"
> > > > both receiving very similar numbers of votes ("Causeway" slightly
> > > > edging it after the dust had settled)
> > > > * at the same time I invited folks to perform the product name
> > > > search for both, and to provide logo ideas for both [3].
> > > >
> > > > Since then (over the last 4 weeks) we've had a good number of logo
> > > > ideas for "Causeway".  As it is my particular favorite, I took the
> > > > time to perform a product name search [3]; I didn't see any issues.
> > > >
> > > > For "Alma", we have had a limited number of logo suggestions, and
> > > > no-one has completed the product name search.
> > > >
> > > > Given that more enthusiasm has been shown for moving to "Causeway",
> > > > I suggest this is the way to go.
> > > >
> > > > ~~~~~~
> > > >
> > > > We now need to run another vote to obtain a mandate for this.  Only
> > > > committers/PMC members need vote this time.
> > > >
> > > >    [+1] change the framework's name to "Causeway"
> > > >    [+0] yes we should change the name, but I don't want to lend my
> > > > vote
> > > to
> > > > this particular name
> > > >    [-0] no, I don't think we should change the name, but I don't
> > > > want to block this change
> > > >    [-1] no, don't change the framework's name at all, or at least
> > > > not to this name.
> > > >
> > > > If you're a PMC member and strongly feel that the name should change
> > > > instead to "Alma", then you should probably vote -1.  However, I
> > > > would
> > > ask
> > > > that you complete the product name search similar to [3] if that's
> > > > the case. Please don't vote against without completing the name
> > > > search, otherwise we end up not being able to move forward with
> > > > either option.
> > > >
> > > > In theory only 72 hours is required for this vote, but as it's so
> > > > important, I again intend to keep the vote alive, I suggest for a
> week.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Dan
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/k5bfzho5tpql2cpk16popp9d6x8rghod
> > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/srpdmolwb99qwj0fboks0yodqgp50zov
> > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-201
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > Kühne + Nagel (AG & Co.) KG
> > Rechtsform: Kommanditgesellschaft, Bremen HRA 21928, USt-IdNr.: DE
> > 812773878.
> > Geschäftsleitung Kühne + Nagel (AG & Co.) KG: Holger Ketz (Vors.), Simon
> > Bitter, Martin Brinkmann, Lars-Olof Grün, Matthias Knicky, Axel Krichel,
> > Johannes Trimborn, Lars Wedel.
> > Persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin: Kühne & Nagel A.G., Rechtsform:
> > Aktiengesellschaft nach luxemburgischem Recht, HR-Nr.: B 18745,
> > Geschäftsführendes Verwaltungsratsmitglied: Karl Gernandt.
> > Geschäftsleitung Region Europa: Jens Drewes (Vors.), Ants Anupold,
> Dominic
> > Edmonds, Thierry Held, Richard Huhn, Jan-Hendrik Köstergarten, Nicholas
> > Minde, André Schiffer, Heiko Schuhmacher.
> >
> > Wir arbeiten ausschließlich auf Grundlage der Allgemeinen Deutschen
> > Spediteurbedingungen 2017 (ADSp 2017). Hinweis: Die ADSp 2017 weichen in
> > Ziffer 23 hinsichtlich des Haftungshöchstbetrages für Güterschäden (§ 431
> > HGB) vom Gesetz ab, indem sie die Haftung bei multimodalen Transporten
> > unter Einschluss einer Seebeförderung und bei unbekanntem Schadenort auf
> 2
> > SZR/kg und im Übrigen die Regelhaftung von 8,33 SZR/kg zusätzlich auf
> 1,25
> > Millionen Euro je Schadenfall sowie 2,5 Millionen Euro je
> Schadenereignis,
> > mindestens aber 2 SZR/kg, beschränken. Die ADSp sind auf unserer Webseite
> > als Download erhältlich. Auf Anfrage senden wir Ihnen diese auch gerne
> zu.
> >
>

Reply via email to