On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@gmail.com> wrote: > The problem of Jackrabbit Core is, that apart from implementing the > Jackrabbit API (which is imported in the bundle), it has its internal > API (for example the PersistenceManager interface or others). This > internal API is not properly separated (in terms of Java Packages) from > implementation classes, which should not leak into the exported package > space. jackrabbit is a few years old and at that time OSGi may not in the big picture. It's worth to move some of the internal API to jackrabbit-api for other bundle to provide different implementation. Tt could well documented and better for third party to extend the jackrabbit.
> One of the major issues still remaining is providing persistence > managers as OSGi bundles. The only feasible, yet not very clean > approach, would be to use fragment bundles. I prefer stay way from fragment if possible :) -Guo
