On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Thomas Müller <thomas.muel...@day.com> wrote: > I would do that only if there is an actual need for it. Do you have > another implementation? Persistence manager, data store, or journal? > If yes, would it be enough to just move the persistence manager > interface, or do we need to do something else (for example does your > implementation extend the abstract bundle persistence manager)? I don't have another implementation at the moment for any of them. But I can think of it's might be possible to add key/value store as bundle persistence store in future. From the exist implementation names such as DerbyPersistenceManager, Oracle9PersistenceManager, CachingPersistenceManager, you can see that there would endless of possibility for new implementations :(
I don't see too much benefit now to move the interface to API, but it would have a clean way to extend jackrabbit for long run. -Guo
