Hi, Guo Du schrieb: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The problem of Jackrabbit Core is, that apart from implementing the >> Jackrabbit API (which is imported in the bundle), it has its internal >> API (for example the PersistenceManager interface or others). This >> internal API is not properly separated (in terms of Java Packages) from >> implementation classes, which should not leak into the exported package >> space. > jackrabbit is a few years old and at that time OSGi may not in the big > picture. It's worth to move some of the internal API to jackrabbit-api > for other bundle to provide different implementation. Tt could well > documented and better for third party to extend the jackrabbit. > > >> One of the major issues still remaining is providing persistence >> managers as OSGi bundles. The only feasible, yet not very clean >> approach, would be to use fragment bundles. > I prefer stay way from fragment if possible :)
I agree absolutely. Regards Felix
