Hi, > Isn't the current appending the simplest and fastest?
No. It requires to keep two indexes: one by number, and one by name. Having only one index (by name) is about twice as fast, and needs about half the disk space / memory. Regards, Thomas
Hi, > Isn't the current appending the simplest and fastest?
No. It requires to keep two indexes: one by number, and one by name. Having only one index (by name) is about twice as fast, and needs about half the disk space / memory. Regards, Thomas