On 20.01.12 16:50, "Thomas Mueller" <muel...@adobe.com> wrote: >>Isn't the current appending the simplest and fastest? > >No. It requires to keep two indexes: one by number, and one by name. >Having only one index (by name) is about twice as fast, and needs about >half the disk space / memory.
Ah, I guess this is because both cases (orderable & non-orderable) share the same data structure underneath. Wouldn't it make sense for J3 to support both cases naturally in the persistence layer? Cheers, Alex -- Alexander Klimetschek Developer // Adobe (Day) // Berlin - Basel
