On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Thomas Mueller <muel...@adobe.com> wrote: >> If we use alphabetical child node lists by default for Jackrabbit 3, then >> we would need to use a different default node type? > > Right, though I suppose there are quite a few applications that use > nt:unstructured either as-is or as a base type for many purposes. > >> Is it even possible to use a different node type than nt:unstructured >> in Jackrabbit 3? > > It is. The default use of nt:unstructured in Jackrabbit 1.x and 2.x > boils down to the use of nt:unstructured as the base type of rep:root. > It should be fairly straightforward to change the root type to specify > an unorderable type as the default for any child nodes.
yes, i agree. cheers stefan > > Doing so may cause some breakage in existing clients that don't > explicitly specify the types they want, but that breakage should be > manageable with proper release notes and workaround instructions. > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting
