On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > It's developed. > > I know. > > > Just need to decide which option is best. > > Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options are.
the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes. We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions. But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the limit, without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing. But it is hard to make a comparison Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead > > As I wrote, that needs to be resolved. > > > But we can delay its integration if needed > > > > Regardd > > > > On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > >> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected] > <javascript:;> > >> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > hello, > >> > I think trunk is now ready for a release. > >> > > >> > I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected. > >> > >> What about the OOM issue? > >> > >> That either needs to be resolved or postponed. > >> > >> > Are you ok to start ? > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Cordialement. > >> > Philippe Mouawad. > >> > > > > > > -- > > Cordialement. > > Philippe Mouawad. > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
