Hi all, I have made some PR to allow the user have a better experience with 3.0
If it's possible, one of you can check my PR and merge it if it's ok before 3.0 release? Thanks Antonio <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b> Garanti sans virus. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> 2016-04-04 23:14 GMT+02:00 Milamber <milam...@apache.org>: > > > On 04/04/2016 14:23, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As it appears there is no pending issue to release a 3.0, any volunteer >> to >> act as RM for 3.0 ? >> > > > Yes, with great pleasure for this great new version! > > I can start a release process next Saturday (or Sunday) > > Milamber > > > > >> Regards >> Philippe >> >> On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to next >>> release following 3.0. >>> >>> If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.moua...@gmail.com');>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It's developed. >>>>>> >>>>> I know. >>>>> >>>>> Just need to decide which option is best. >>>>>> >>>>> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options are. >>>>> >>>> >>>> the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes. >>>> We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions. >>>> But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the limit, >>>> without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing. >>>> But it is hard to make a comparison >>>> >>>> Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead >>>> >>>> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved. >>>>> >>>>> But we can delay its integration if needed >>>>>> >>>>>> Regardd >>>>>> >>>>>> On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>> >>>>>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com >>>>> >>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> hello, >>>>>>>> I think trunk is now ready for a release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> What about the OOM issue? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That either needs to be resolved or postponed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you ok to start ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Cordialement. >>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> Cordialement. >>> Philippe Mouawad. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >
