On 04/04/2016 14:23, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
Hi,
As it appears there is no pending issue to release a 3.0, any volunteer to
act as RM for 3.0 ?
Yes, with great pleasure for this great new version!
I can start a release process next Saturday (or Sunday)
Milamber
Regards
Philippe
On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
wrote:
As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to next
release following 3.0.
If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ?
Regards
On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.moua...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
wrote:
It's developed.
I know.
Just need to decide which option is best.
Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options are.
the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes.
We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions.
But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the limit,
without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing.
But it is hard to make a comparison
Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead
As I wrote, that needs to be resolved.
But we can delay its integration if needed
Regardd
On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.moua...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>> wrote:
hello,
I think trunk is now ready for a release.
I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected.
What about the OOM issue?
That either needs to be resolved or postponed.
Are you ok to start ?
Thanks
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
