Thank to your quick answer If anybody have the time to do it it will be great
2016-04-12 19:32 GMT+02:00 sebb <[email protected]>: > On 12 April 2016 at 18:17, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Sebb, > > > > My opinion is it will be better to merge it for 3.0 because the majority > of > > my PR are about HTML report. > > > > And the majority of users will see the HTML report for the first time in > > this release and the first impression is very important. > > > > And if you check my PR you can see: > > Sorry, but I don't have time to review the changes. > > > modification of label to be consistent with other listener and between > > tables in HTML report > > modification of some axis label to be more accurate (I have add "average" > > to avoid user search in documentation which metric is) > > fix a bug about encoding accent when the HTML report are generated in a > > French OS > > > > It's details but details are very important in my opinion > > > > There are PR for other details (one PR to have a better (for me) IHM, > > another to have another default column sort (more usefull in my opinion) > > > > I am planning to fix other details and add some features for 3.1 release > (I > > have take some free time to fix the previous PR to 3.0 release before to > > implement the new one) > > > > Antonio > > > > 2016-04-12 15:17 GMT+02:00 sebb <[email protected]>: > > > >> On 12 April 2016 at 13:50, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > I cannot merge before thursday evening. > >> > Anybody else can ? > >> > Milamber when do you plan to make the release ? > >> > > >> > Should we merge those or wait for 3.1 ? > >> > >> wait for 3.1 > >> > >> > Regards > >> > > >> > On Monday, April 11, 2016, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi all, > >> >> > >> >> I have made some PR to allow the user have a better experience with > 3.0 > >> >> > >> >> If it's possible, one of you can check my PR and merge it if it's ok > >> before > >> >> 3.0 release? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks > >> >> Antonio > >> >> > >> >> < > >> >> > >> > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b > >> >> > > >> >> Garanti > >> >> sans virus. www.avast.com > >> >> < > >> >> > >> > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b > >> >> > > >> >> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > >> >> > >> >> 2016-04-04 23:14 GMT+02:00 Milamber <[email protected] > >> <javascript:;>>: > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On 04/04/2016 14:23, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> Hi, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> As it appears there is no pending issue to release a 3.0, any > >> volunteer > >> >> >> to > >> >> >> act as RM for 3.0 ? > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Yes, with great pleasure for this great new version! > >> >> > > >> >> > I can start a release process next Saturday (or Sunday) > >> >> > > >> >> > Milamber > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> Regards > >> >> >> Philippe > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Philippe Mouawad < > >> [email protected] > >> >> <javascript:;>> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to > >> next > >> >> >>> release following 3.0. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ? > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> Regards > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad < > >> >> [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> >> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected] > >> >> <javascript:;>');>> wrote: > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad < > >> >> [email protected] <javascript:;>> > >> >> >>>>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> It's developed. > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>> I know. > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> Just need to decide which option is best. > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the > options > >> are. > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes. > >> >> >>>> We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions. > >> >> >>>> But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the > >> limit, > >> >> >>>> without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing. > >> >> >>>> But it is hard to make a comparison > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved. > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> But we can delay its integration if needed > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> Regardd > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad < > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> hello, > >> >> >>>>>>>> I think trunk is now ready for a release. > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected. > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> What about the OOM issue? > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> That either needs to be resolved or postponed. > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> Are you ok to start ? > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>> -- > >> >> >>>>>>>> Cordialement. > >> >> >>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> -- > >> >> >>>>>> Cordialement. > >> >> >>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>> -- > >> >> >>>> Cordialement. > >> >> >>>> Philippe Mouawad. > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> -- > >> >> >>> Cordialement. > >> >> >>> Philippe Mouawad. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Cordialement. > >> > Philippe Mouawad. > >> >
