Hello, See: - https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ip_clearance.html
Regards On Tuesday, October 3, 2017, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm also curious about why we could not integrate apache licensed code. I > was thinking we can fork a plugin and integrate it in JMeter. > > Anybody have an idea? > > Antonio > > 2017-10-02 21:25 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>>: > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > > AFAIK, unless the project donates their code to JMeter, we cannot > take > > it > > > as it would be a license infringement at minimum. > > > > > > It's open source under the Apache 2.0 license. The license itself > allows > > > you to bundle it with JMeter proper. Of course, it won't be owned by > the > > > ASF but you can have it as a dependency. > > > > > > You could also "fork" it (or "vendor" it) if you want to add some > > patches. > > > > > > > AFAIK, we need for this the owner to make a donation as piece of code is > > important. > > There is IP clearance process at Apache for that. I doubt that we can > take > > it as is or fork it, but I'm not an expert in those matters. > > Maybe Andrei can tell us more. > > > > > > > > > Have there been any talks with CA Technologies / Blazemeter to perhaps > > > donate the plugin to the ASF? > > > > > > > Would you like to work on its implementation ? > > > > > > Why would I do that when you have this plugin available under a > > compatible > > > license as well as this other one > > > https://github.com/syucream/jmeter-http2-plugin under Apache 2.0 based > > on > > > netty? > > > > > I tested this one, it does not work very well. > > Looks more like a POC than a stable implementation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --emi > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Philippe Mouawad < > > > philippe.moua...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Emilian, > > > > AFAIK, unless the project donates their code to JMeter, we cannot > take > > it > > > > as it would be a license infringement at minimum. > > > > > > > > Regarding HTTP2 there are many options AFAIK: > > > > > > > > - Jetty > > > > - Netty > > > > - HC5 > > > > > > > > Would you like to work on its implementation ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > I see we have a HTTP2 plugin > > > > > https://github.com/Blazemeter/jmeter-bzm-plugins based on the > Jetty > > > > HTTP2 > > > > > support and under an Apache 2.0 license. > > > > > > > > > > Is there any reason JMeter could not bless this implementation and > > > bundle > > > > > it? > > > > > > > > > > --emi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Cordialement. > > > > Philippe Mouawad. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cordialement. > > Philippe Mouawad. > > > -- Regards Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com> Team Follow us on Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack> Cordialement L'équipe Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com> Suivez-nous sur Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
