Hi all, it's been a while and there's been some more discussions of the KIP which have been addressed on the KIP page.
I think it's a good time to revive this vote thread and get things moving. We're currently at +3 (non-binding) and -1 (non-binding) votes. Regards, Magnus Den mån 1 nov. 2021 kl 21:19 skrev J Rivers <jrivers...@gmail.com>: > +1 > > Thank you for the KIP! > > Our organization runs kafka at large scale in a multi-tenant configuration. > We actually have many other enterprises connecting up to our system to > retrieve stream data. These feeds vary greatly in volume and velocity. The > peak rates are a multiplicative factor of the nominal. There is extreme > skew in our datasets in a number of ways. > > We don't have time to work with every new internal/external client to tune > their feeds. They need to be able to take one of the many kafka clients and > go off to the races. > > Being able to retrieve client metrics would be invaluable here as it's hard > and time consuming to communicate out of the enterprise walls. > > This KIP is important to us to expand the use of our datasets internally > and outside the borders of the enterprise. Our clients like the performance > and data safeties related to the kafka connection. The observability has > been a problem... > > Jonathan Rivers > jrivers...@gmail.com > > > > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:56 PM Ryanne Dolan <ryannedo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > -1 > > > > Ryanne > > > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021, 4:30 AM Magnus Edenhill <mag...@edenhill.se> > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-714. > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2xRRCg > > > > > > Discussion thread: > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg119000.html > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Magnus > > > > > >
