+1 Thanks Magnus! On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 5:43 AM Magnus Edenhill <mag...@edenhill.se> wrote:
> Hey all, > > It's that time of year again where we re-restart this vote thread after > some additional > discussions on the disco thread and minor adjustments&clarifications to the > KIP. > > We're currently at +5 (non-binding) and -1 (non-binding) votes. > > Please cast your votes, people. > > > Thanks, > Magnus > > > Den tors 3 mars 2022 kl 15:39 skrev Julien Chanaud < > chanaud.jul...@gmail.com > >: > > > +1 > > As a member of a team which operates several Kafka clusters, I am > > unequipped when it comes to troubleshooting issues with project teams > > that did not understand the importance of configuring client-side > > monitoring. > > Kafka represents a fraction of their work and they don't have enough > > experience, time or interest in trying to understand the meaning behind > > every metric. > > > > I stand 100% behind what Colin stated back in June in the Discuss thread > : > > > > > Magnus and I explained a few times the reasons why it does matter. > Within > > > most organizations, there are usually several teams using clients, > which > > > are separate from the team which maintains the Kafka cluster. The Kafka > > > team has the Kafka experts, which makes it the best place to centralize > > > collecting and analyzing Kafka metrics. > > > > > > Thanks for this KIP. > > > > Le mer. 26 janv. 2022 à 16:01, rifer...@riferrei.com < > > rifer...@riferrei.com> > > a écrit : > > > > > +1 > > > > > > I think this KIP solves a problem that has been around for some time > with > > > Kafka deployments, which is the ability to assess the current state of > a > > > Kafka architecture but looking at the whole picture. I also share other > > > folks' concerns regarding adding runtime dependencies to the clients; > > this > > > may be problematic for large deployments. Still, I think it is worth > > > refactoring. > > > > > > IMHO, it is a fair trade-off. > > > > > > — Ricardo > > > > > > > On Jan 26, 2022, at 9:34 AM, Magnus Edenhill <mag...@edenhill.se> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > it's been a while and there's been some more discussions of the KIP > > which > > > > have been > > > > addressed on the KIP page. > > > > > > > > I think it's a good time to revive this vote thread and get things > > > moving. > > > > > > > > We're currently at +3 (non-binding) and -1 (non-binding) votes. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Magnus > > > > > > > > > > > > Den mån 1 nov. 2021 kl 21:19 skrev J Rivers <jrivers...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > >> +1 > > > >> > > > >> Thank you for the KIP! > > > >> > > > >> Our organization runs kafka at large scale in a multi-tenant > > > configuration. > > > >> We actually have many other enterprises connecting up to our system > to > > > >> retrieve stream data. These feeds vary greatly in volume and > velocity. > > > The > > > >> peak rates are a multiplicative factor of the nominal. There is > > extreme > > > >> skew in our datasets in a number of ways. > > > >> > > > >> We don't have time to work with every new internal/external client > to > > > tune > > > >> their feeds. They need to be able to take one of the many kafka > > clients > > > and > > > >> go off to the races. > > > >> > > > >> Being able to retrieve client metrics would be invaluable here as > it's > > > hard > > > >> and time consuming to communicate out of the enterprise walls. > > > >> > > > >> This KIP is important to us to expand the use of our datasets > > internally > > > >> and outside the borders of the enterprise. Our clients like the > > > performance > > > >> and data safeties related to the kafka connection. The observability > > has > > > >> been a problem... > > > >> > > > >> Jonathan Rivers > > > >> jrivers...@gmail.com > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:56 PM Ryanne Dolan < > ryannedo...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> -1 > > > >>> > > > >>> Ryanne > > > >>> > > > >>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021, 4:30 AM Magnus Edenhill <mag...@edenhill.se> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Hi all, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-714. > > > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2xRRCg > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Discussion thread: > > > >>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg119000.html > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > >>>> Magnus > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
