Another (small) ZK migration issue was identified. This one isn't a
regression (it has existed since 3.4), but I think it's reasonable to
include. It's a small configuration check that could potentially save end
users from some headaches down the line.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15450
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14367

I think we can get this one committed to trunk today.

-David



On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 7:50 PM Ismael Juma <m...@ismaeljuma.com> wrote:

> Hi Satish,
>
> That sounds great. I think we should aim to only allow blockers
> (regressions, impactful security issues, etc.) on the 3.6 branch until
> 3.6.0 is out.
>
> Ismael
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 9, 2023, 12:20 AM Satish Duggana <satish.dugg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ismael,
> > It looks like we will publish RC0 by 14th Sep.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Satish.
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 19:23, Ismael Juma <m...@ismaeljuma.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Satish,
> > >
> > > Do you have a sense of when we'll publish RC0?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ismael
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 6:27 AM David Arthur
> > > <david.art...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Quick update on my two blockers: KAFKA-15435 is merged to trunk and
> > > > cherry-picked to 3.6. I have a PR open for KAFKA-15441 and will
> > hopefully
> > > > get it merged today.
> > > >
> > > > -David
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 5:26 AM Ivan Yurchenko <i...@ivanyu.me>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Satish and all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I wonder if https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14993
> > should be
> > > > > included in the 3.6 release plan. I'm thinking that when
> > implemented, it
> > > > > would be a small, but still a change in the RSM contract: throw an
> > > > > exception instead of returning an empty InputStream. Maybe it
> should
> > be
> > > > > included right away to save the migration later? What do you think?
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Ivan
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2023, at 02:52, Satish Duggana wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Jose,
> > > > > > Thanks for looking into this issue and resolving it with a quick
> > fix.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ~Satish.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 21:40, José Armando García Sancio
> > > > > > <jsan...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Satish,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 4:58 PM Satish Duggana <
> > > > > satish.dugg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > > > > > It seems https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14273
> has
> > > > been
> > > > > > > > there in 3.5.x too.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I also agree that it should be a blocker for 3.6.0. It should
> > have
> > > > > > > been a blocker for those previous releases. I didn't fix it
> > because,
> > > > > > > unfortunately, I wasn't aware of the issue and jira.
> > > > > > > I'll create a PR with a fix in case the original author doesn't
> > > > > respond in time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Satish, do you agree?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > -José
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -David
> > > >
> >
>


-- 
-David

Reply via email to