Hi Ismael,
It looks like we will publish RC0 by 14th Sep.

Thanks,
Satish.

On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 19:23, Ismael Juma <m...@ismaeljuma.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Satish,
>
> Do you have a sense of when we'll publish RC0?
>
> Thanks,
> Ismael
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 6:27 AM David Arthur
> <david.art...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Quick update on my two blockers: KAFKA-15435 is merged to trunk and
> > cherry-picked to 3.6. I have a PR open for KAFKA-15441 and will hopefully
> > get it merged today.
> >
> > -David
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 5:26 AM Ivan Yurchenko <i...@ivanyu.me> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Satish and all,
> > >
> > > I wonder if https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14993 should be
> > > included in the 3.6 release plan. I'm thinking that when implemented, it
> > > would be a small, but still a change in the RSM contract: throw an
> > > exception instead of returning an empty InputStream. Maybe it should be
> > > included right away to save the migration later? What do you think?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Ivan
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2023, at 02:52, Satish Duggana wrote:
> > > > Hi Jose,
> > > > Thanks for looking into this issue and resolving it with a quick fix.
> > > >
> > > > ~Satish.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 21:40, José Armando García Sancio
> > > > <jsan...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Satish,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 4:58 PM Satish Duggana <
> > > satish.dugg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > > > It seems https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14273 has
> > been
> > > > > > there in 3.5.x too.
> > > > >
> > > > > I also agree that it should be a blocker for 3.6.0. It should have
> > > > > been a blocker for those previous releases. I didn't fix it because,
> > > > > unfortunately, I wasn't aware of the issue and jira.
> > > > > I'll create a PR with a fix in case the original author doesn't
> > > respond in time.
> > > > >
> > > > > Satish, do you agree?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > --
> > > > > -José
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -David
> >

Reply via email to