+1 On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ＋1 > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Aditya Auradkar < > aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Todd Palino <tpal...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > +1000 > > > > > > > > ! > > > > > > > > -Todd > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, September 23, 2015, Jiangjie Qin > > <j...@linkedin.com.invalid > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for the reviews and feedback on KIP-31. It looks all > the > > > > > concerns of the KIP has been addressed. I would like to start the > > > voting > > > > > process. > > > > > > > > > > The short summary for the KIP: > > > > > We are going to use the relative offset in the message format to > > avoid > > > > > server side recompression. > > > > > > > > > > In case you haven't got a chance to check, here is the KIP link. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-31+-+Move+to+relative+offsets+in+compressed+message+sets > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks, > > > Neha > > > > > > > > > -- > -- Guozhang > -- -Regards, Mayuresh R. Gharat (862) 250-7125
