+1. I agree that it's worth thinking through the migration plan a bit more.
Thanks, Jun On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 on everything but the upgrade plan, which is a bit scary - will > comment on the discuss thread. > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Mayuresh Gharat > <gharatmayures...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> ＋1 > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Aditya Auradkar < > >> aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> > +1 > >> > > >> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Todd Palino <tpal...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > +1000 > >> > > > > >> > > > ! > >> > > > > >> > > > -Todd > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wednesday, September 23, 2015, Jiangjie Qin > >> > <j...@linkedin.com.invalid > >> > > > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks a lot for the reviews and feedback on KIP-31. It looks > all > >> the > >> > > > > concerns of the KIP has been addressed. I would like to start > the > >> > > voting > >> > > > > process. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > The short summary for the KIP: > >> > > > > We are going to use the relative offset in the message format to > >> > avoid > >> > > > > server side recompression. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > In case you haven't got a chance to check, here is the KIP link. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-31+-+Move+to+relative+offsets+in+compressed+message+sets > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Neha > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> -- Guozhang > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > -Regards, > > Mayuresh R. Gharat > > (862) 250-7125 >
