+1 Dong
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Jiangjie Qin <j...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Sorry for this prolonged voting session and thanks for the votes. > > There is an additional broker configuration change added to the KIP after > the vote. We propose to add a message.format.version configuration to the > broker to indicate which version it should use to store the message on > disk. > > It is mainly trying to minimize the format conversion for consumption > during rolling out. Because the client upgrade could take some time and it > can be expensive to give up zero-copy for the majority of the consumers, we > want to avoid doing that. > > I would like to see if people have concerns over this change or not. If > there is no concerns, I will close the vote as passed. Otherwise I will > initiate another vote. > > Thanks, > > Jiangjie (Becket) QIn > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -Ewen > > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > +1. I agree that it's worth thinking through the migration plan a bit > > more. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 on everything but the upgrade plan, which is a bit scary - will > > > > comment on the discuss thread. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Mayuresh Gharat > > > > <gharatmayures...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Guozhang Wang < > wangg...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> ＋1 > > > > >> > > > > >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Aditya Auradkar < > > > > >> aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > +1 > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Neha Narkhede < > n...@confluent.io > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > +1 > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Todd Palino < > tpal...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > +1000 > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > ! > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > -Todd > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > On Wednesday, September 23, 2015, Jiangjie Qin > > > > >> > <j...@linkedin.com.invalid > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Hi, > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks a lot for the reviews and feedback on KIP-31. It > > looks > > > > all > > > > >> the > > > > >> > > > > concerns of the KIP has been addressed. I would like to > > start > > > > the > > > > >> > > voting > > > > >> > > > > process. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > The short summary for the KIP: > > > > >> > > > > We are going to use the relative offset in the message > > format > > > to > > > > >> > avoid > > > > >> > > > > server side recompression. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > In case you haven't got a chance to check, here is the KIP > > > link. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-31+-+Move+to+relative+offsets+in+compressed+message+sets > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > -- > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > > > >> > > Neha > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> -- Guozhang > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > -Regards, > > > > > Mayuresh R. Gharat > > > > > (862) 250-7125 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Ewen > > >
