Hi folks, Sorry for this prolonged voting session and thanks for the votes.
There is an additional broker configuration change added to the KIP after the vote. We propose to add a message.format.version configuration to the broker to indicate which version it should use to store the message on disk. It is mainly trying to minimize the format conversion for consumption during rolling out. Because the client upgrade could take some time and it can be expensive to give up zero-copy for the majority of the consumers, we want to avoid doing that. I would like to see if people have concerns over this change or not. If there is no concerns, I will close the vote as passed. Otherwise I will initiate another vote. Thanks, Jiangjie (Becket) QIn On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io> wrote: > +1 > > -Ewen > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > +1. I agree that it's worth thinking through the migration plan a bit > more. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jun > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 on everything but the upgrade plan, which is a bit scary - will > > > comment on the discuss thread. > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Mayuresh Gharat > > > <gharatmayures...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> ＋1 > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Aditya Auradkar < > > > >> aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > +1 > > > >> > > > > >> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > +1 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Todd Palino <tpal...@gmail.com > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > +1000 > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > ! > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > -Todd > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Wednesday, September 23, 2015, Jiangjie Qin > > > >> > <j...@linkedin.com.invalid > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Hi, > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks a lot for the reviews and feedback on KIP-31. It > looks > > > all > > > >> the > > > >> > > > > concerns of the KIP has been addressed. I would like to > start > > > the > > > >> > > voting > > > >> > > > > process. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > The short summary for the KIP: > > > >> > > > > We are going to use the relative offset in the message > format > > to > > > >> > avoid > > > >> > > > > server side recompression. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > In case you haven't got a chance to check, here is the KIP > > link. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-31+-+Move+to+relative+offsets+in+compressed+message+sets > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > -- > > > >> > > Thanks, > > > >> > > Neha > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> -- Guozhang > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -Regards, > > > > Mayuresh R. Gharat > > > > (862) 250-7125 > > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > Ewen >
