Hey Ismael,

Sorry for being late on this KIP. At LinkedIn we are still in the progress
or migrating from Scala 2.10 to 2.11. I am not sure how many other existing
Kafka users are still on Scala 2.10. But given that until now the default
Scala version is still 2.10.6, I feel it is a little too aggressive to move
default version to 2.11 and drop 2.10 support at the same time. We are
essentially dropping support of the current default Scala version.

Since we have a policy for API deprecation, i.e. add new interface and mark
the old one as deprecated at release X, drop the old interface at release
X+1. It seems reasonable to do the same for Scala version here. So should
we consider only making Scala version 2.11 as default in Kafka 0.11.0 and
drop support for Scala 2.10 in Kafka 0.11.1?

Thanks,

Jiangjie (Becket) Qin

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Apurva Mehta <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > -Ewen
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:56 AM, Jozef.koval <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Jozef
> > >
> > > P.S. I volunteer to help with this KIP.
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.ch), encrypted email based
> in
> > > Switzerland.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-119: Drop Support for Scala 2.10 in Kafka 0.11
> > > Local Time: March 1, 2017 1:46 PM
> > > UTC Time: March 1, 2017 12:46 PM
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > To: [email protected]
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bill
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Eno Thereska <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1, thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Eno
> > > > > On 28 Feb 2017, at 17:17, Guozhang Wang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Tom Crayford <
> [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 at 11:42, Molnár Bálint <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> +1
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> 2017-02-28 12:17 GMT+01:00 Dongjin Lee <[email protected]>:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> +1.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Best,
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Dongjin
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> --
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Dongjin Lee
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Software developer in Line+.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> So interested in massive-scale machine learning.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr (
> > http://www.facebook.com/
> > > > >>>> dongjin.lee.kr)
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> linkedin: kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr (
> > > > >> http://kr.linkedin.com/in/
> > > > >>>> dongjinleekr)
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> github: (http://goog_969573159/)github.com/dongjinleekr (
> > > > >>>> http://github.com/dongjinleekr)
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> twitter: www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr (http://www.twitter.com/
> > > > >>>> dongjinleekr)
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Feb 28, 2017 at 6:40 PM, <Ismael Juma (mailto:
> > [email protected]
> > > > >> )>
> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Hi everyone,
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Since the few who responded in the discuss thread were in
> favour
> > > and
> > > > >>>> there
> > > > >>>>> were no objections, I would like to initiate the voting process
> > for
> > > > >>>>> KIP-119: Drop Support for Scala 2.10 in Kafka 0.11:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > >>>> 119%3A+Drop+Support+for+Scala+2.10+in+Kafka+0.11
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>> Ismael
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > -- Guozhang
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to