Thanks for the clarification, Ismael. In that case, it is reasonable to drop support for Scala 2.10. LinkedIn is probably fine with this change.
I did not notice we have recommended Scala version on the download page. +1 on the KIP On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Grant Henke <ghe...@cloudera.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > Since the few who responded in the discuss thread were in favour and > > there > > > were no objections, I would like to initiate the voting process for > > > KIP-119: Drop Support for Scala 2.10 in Kafka 0.11: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > 119%3A+Drop+Support+for+Scala+2.10+in+Kafka+0.11 > > > > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Gwen Shapira* > > Product Manager | Confluent > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap > > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog > > <http://www.confluent.io/blog> > > > > > > -- > Grant Henke > Software Engineer | Cloudera > gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke >
