+1 non-binding
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Dong Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Becket Qin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks for the clarification, Ismael. In that case, it is reasonable to >> drop support for Scala 2.10. LinkedIn is probably fine with this change. >> >> I did not notice we have recommended Scala version on the download page. >> >> +1 on the KIP >> >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Grant Henke <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Gwen Shapira <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Ismael Juma <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi everyone, >> > > > >> > > > Since the few who responded in the discuss thread were in favour and >> > > there >> > > > were no objections, I would like to initiate the voting process for >> > > > KIP-119: Drop Support for Scala 2.10 in Kafka 0.11: >> > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- >> > > > 119%3A+Drop+Support+for+Scala+2.10+in+Kafka+0.11 >> > > > >> > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Ismael >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > *Gwen Shapira* >> > > Product Manager | Confluent >> > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap >> > > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog >> > > <http://www.confluent.io/blog> >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Grant Henke >> > Software Engineer | Cloudera >> > [email protected] | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke >> > >>
