+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Becket Qin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification, Ismael. In that case, it is reasonable to > drop support for Scala 2.10. LinkedIn is probably fine with this change. > > I did not notice we have recommended Scala version on the download page. > > +1 on the KIP > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Grant Henke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Gwen Shapira <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Ismael Juma <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > Since the few who responded in the discuss thread were in favour and > > > there > > > > were no objections, I would like to initiate the voting process for > > > > KIP-119: Drop Support for Scala 2.10 in Kafka 0.11: > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > > 119%3A+Drop+Support+for+Scala+2.10+in+Kafka+0.11 > > > > > > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > *Gwen Shapira* > > > Product Manager | Confluent > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap > > > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog > > > <http://www.confluent.io/blog> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Grant Henke > > Software Engineer | Cloudera > > [email protected] | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke > > >
