We use other open source projects all the time in our apache projects - even core functionality. What should matter is the right solution - I hate to think any apache project suffers from not invented here syndrome. On 15 Apr 2011, at 09:57, Christian Schneider wrote:
> I absolutely agree with Ioannis. The default configuration management or > clustering support for karaf should be part of the Karaf project - or > alternatively be a separate project at Apache or a similar community. > > Christian > > Am 15.04.2011 10:48, schrieb Ioannis Canellos: >>> it and it makes no sense to create a schism within Karaf project. >>> >> Charles, >> >> I do not wish my statement to be taken as "schismatic". I do not wish a >> split community and I don't think that anyone does. >> Voting is not about splinting. Voting is about uniting different views under >> the banner of "majority". >> >> I am sure Guillaume did a great work. What I don't like about it is that it >> comes as a fuse project (don't have an issue with fuse I respect and admire >> your work), but imho a critical feature like this should be 100% part of the >> karaf trunk. >> >> *Ioannis Canellos* >> * >> http://iocanel.blogspot.com >> >> Apache Karaf<http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer& PMC >> Apache ServiceMix<http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer >> * >> > > -- > ---- > http://www.liquid-reality.de >