We use other open source projects all the time in our apache projects - even 
core functionality. What should matter is the right solution - I hate to think 
any apache project suffers from not invented here syndrome.
On 15 Apr 2011, at 09:57, Christian Schneider wrote:

> I absolutely agree with Ioannis. The default configuration management or 
> clustering support for karaf should be part of the Karaf project - or 
> alternatively be a separate project at Apache or a similar community.
> 
> Christian
> 
> Am 15.04.2011 10:48, schrieb Ioannis Canellos:
>>> it and it makes no sense to create a schism within Karaf project.
>>> 
>> Charles,
>> 
>> I do not wish my statement to be taken as "schismatic". I do not wish a
>> split community and I don't think that anyone does.
>> Voting is not about splinting. Voting is about uniting different views under
>> the banner of "majority".
>> 
>> I am sure Guillaume did a great work. What I don't like about it is that it
>> comes as a fuse project (don't have an issue with fuse I respect and admire
>> your work), but imho a critical feature like this should be 100% part of the
>> karaf trunk.
>> 
>> *Ioannis Canellos*
>> *
>>  http://iocanel.blogspot.com
>> 
>> Apache Karaf<http://karaf.apache.org/>  Committer&  PMC
>> Apache ServiceMix<http://servicemix.apache.org/>   Committer
>> *
>> 
> 
> -- 
> ----
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
> 

Reply via email to