I believe that Karaf clustering is a first level feature for Karaf
3.0, as such perhaps it can be made available as a user selectable
choice - same as one can choose felix, equinox, or another OSGi
container.

As the default solution I have to give it a -1, as I think we really
need to be able to support it directly in Karaf.

Jamie

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Christian Schneider
<ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
> I am absolutely positive to reuse existing solutions and to not redo efforts
> that have been done elsewhere. That is why I did not insist on the
> clustering solution being an apache project.
> Though as you for sure know there are two kinds of open source projects. One
> kind is driven and "owned" by a community and the other kind by a company.
> The difference is in freedom for users as well as for contributors.
>
> For example in the case of config management and deployment Talend will also
> like to help drive the solution. In case of a community driven project this
> will be possible. In case of a fuse product it may or may not be possible
> depending on the current position of the Fuse management. So while in open
> source it is always possible to fork a project only community driven and
> owned projects allow collaboration of several vendors in the same project in
> the long run.
>
> So for this reason I think that strategic dependencies of apache projects
> should be community driven if possible.
>
> Just to name one case where this is not the case is spring. While the
> product is great and helps the apache projects a lot it is not possible to
> really take part in the spring development. So while we would sur elike to
> fix or change many things in spring we could only do this by creating a fork
> which would be a baad choice. So it iss no wonder that many projects try to
> be more independent of spring.
>
> Christian
>
>
> Am 15.04.2011 11:11, schrieb Rob Davies:
>>
>> We use other open source projects all the time in our apache projects -
>> even core functionality. What should matter is the right solution - I hate
>> to think any apache project suffers from not invented here syndrome.
>> On 15 Apr 2011, at 09:57, Christian Schneider wrote:
>>
>
> --
> ----
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
>

Reply via email to