Thanks Scott,
I will review and apply the patch.
Regards
JB
On 09/12/2012 03:30 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote:
Makes sense to me. They still have a number of issues that they are
working to include in 1.8.x. I will add a note in the Javadoc stating what
version is currently supported.
I am uploading a new patch to KARAF-1753 today. It will take the place of
the one currently attached to the ticket. It catches up on some conflicts
to the original patch.
Best Regards,
Scott ES
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
Oh, got it Scott.
IMHO, I would prefer to stay with Felix DS 1.6.0. As we are going to
release 2.3.0 very soon, we can ship SNAPSHOT.
Regards
JB
On 09/12/2012 03:22 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote:
Thanks for the response. Bad question on my part.
Better question is are we going to wait until all the functionality that
is
to be included in Karaf 2.3 that is dependent on the corresponding Felix
projects to get updated? Felix DS (SCR) with support for OSGi 4.3/DS Spec
1.2 (Felix DS 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT) is still under development.
Should I migrate the SCR bundles to the Felix DS 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT for Karaf
2.3?
Or do I wait, leave it at OSGi 4.2/DS Spec 1.1 (Felix DS 1.6.0) and then
update them in a later release of Karaf 2.3.x?
I am OK with either. Just need your input.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net
wrote:
Hi Scott,
Karaf 2.3 already uses OSGi r4.3 (and corresponding framework).
Regards
JB
On 09/12/2012 02:41 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote:
Hi All,
What was the final outcome on this? Is Karaf-2.3.x going to be based on
OSGi 4.3?
Needing to know if I should update the Karaf 2.3.x SCR bundles to the
Felix
DS 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT which has the 4.3 support in it.
Best Regards,
Scott ES
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 for Andreas's first plan.
Freeman
－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:ff...@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.****com<http://freemanfang.**
blogspot.com <http://freemanfang.blogspot.com>>
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/****1473905042<http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/**1473905042>
<http://blog.sina.**com.cn/u/1473905042<http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042>
weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
On 2012-8-18, at 下午1:19, Andreas Pieber wrote:
TBH I personally would rather prefer:
- Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0
- Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
- Karaf 3.x.y => OSGi core 4.3.0
- Karaf 4.x.y => OSGi core 5.0.0
or
- Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0
- Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
- Karaf 3.x.y => OSGi core 5.0.0
I know that both options are not really optimal, but I don't think
that we really want to upgrade the inner core of the entire thing to
the next major version in a minor of Karaf. There where some API
changes from a user lvl of view which disallow to drop the same bundle
into a 4.2/4.3 environment and a 5.0. I do not really fancy the idea
of breaking compatibility between minor releases. If ppls setup break
from one minor to the next they lost trust and upgrade ways too late
although there should be no reason.
WDYT?
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
j...@nanthrax.net
wrote:
Hi team,
As you know, OSGi core 5.0.0 has been released.
I would like to discuss about which version of Karaf should support
which
version of the OSGi core (and so the corresponding OSGi frameworks).
I have the following proposal:
- Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0
- Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
- Karaf 3.0.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
- Karaf 3.1.x => OSGi core 5.0.0
I would wait Karaf 3.1.x to update to OSGi core 5.0.0 as the OSGi
frameworks
are not yet fully ready on this specification.
WDYT ?
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
