Thanks JB. Updated patches have been added to KARAF-1753.
Best Regards, Scott ES On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks Scott, > > I will review and apply the patch. > > Regards > JB > > > On 09/12/2012 03:30 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote: > >> Makes sense to me. They still have a number of issues that they are >> working to include in 1.8.x. I will add a note in the Javadoc stating >> what >> version is currently supported. >> >> I am uploading a new patch to KARAF-1753 today. It will take the place of >> the one currently attached to the ticket. It catches up on some conflicts >> to the original patch. >> >> Best Regards, >> Scott ES >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> Oh, got it Scott. >>> >>> IMHO, I would prefer to stay with Felix DS 1.6.0. As we are going to >>> release 2.3.0 very soon, we can ship SNAPSHOT. >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 09/12/2012 03:22 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the response. Bad question on my part. >>>> >>>> Better question is are we going to wait until all the functionality that >>>> is >>>> to be included in Karaf 2.3 that is dependent on the corresponding Felix >>>> projects to get updated? Felix DS (SCR) with support for OSGi 4.3/DS >>>> Spec >>>> 1.2 (Felix DS 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT) is still under development. >>>> >>>> Should I migrate the SCR bundles to the Felix DS 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT for >>>> Karaf >>>> 2.3? >>>> >>>> Or do I wait, leave it at OSGi 4.2/DS Spec 1.1 (Felix DS 1.6.0) and then >>>> update them in a later release of Karaf 2.3.x? >>>> >>>> I am OK with either. Just need your input. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected] >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Scott, >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Karaf 2.3 already uses OSGi r4.3 (and corresponding framework). >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 09/12/2012 02:41 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What was the final outcome on this? Is Karaf-2.3.x going to be based >>>>>> on >>>>>> OSGi 4.3? >>>>>> >>>>>> Needing to know if I should update the Karaf 2.3.x SCR bundles to the >>>>>> Felix >>>>>> DS 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT which has the 4.3 support in it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>> Scott ES >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Freeman Fang <[email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> +1 for Andreas's first plan. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Freeman >>>>>>> －－－－－－－－－－－－－ >>>>>>> Freeman Fang >>>>>>> >>>>>>> FuseSource >>>>>>> Email:[email protected] >>>>>>> Web: fusesource.com >>>>>>> Twitter: freemanfang >>>>>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.******com<http://freemanfang.** >>>>>>> blogspot.com >>>>>>> <http://freemanfang.blogspot.**com<http://freemanfang.blogspot.com> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/******1473905042<http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/****1473905042> >>>>>>> <http://blog.sina.**com.cn/u/**1473905042<http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/**1473905042> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://blog.sina.**com.cn/u/**1473905042<http://com.cn/u/1473905042> >>>>>>> <http://blog.sina.**com.cn/u/1473905042<http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2012-8-18, at 下午1:19, Andreas Pieber wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> TBH I personally would rather prefer: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0 >>>>>>>> - Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0 >>>>>>>> - Karaf 3.x.y => OSGi core 4.3.0 >>>>>>>> - Karaf 4.x.y => OSGi core 5.0.0 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0 >>>>>>>> - Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0 >>>>>>>> - Karaf 3.x.y => OSGi core 5.0.0 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I know that both options are not really optimal, but I don't think >>>>>>>> that we really want to upgrade the inner core of the entire thing to >>>>>>>> the next major version in a minor of Karaf. There where some API >>>>>>>> changes from a user lvl of view which disallow to drop the same >>>>>>>> bundle >>>>>>>> into a 4.2/4.3 environment and a 5.0. I do not really fancy the idea >>>>>>>> of breaking compatibility between minor releases. If ppls setup >>>>>>>> break >>>>>>>> from one minor to the next they lost trust and upgrade ways too late >>>>>>>> although there should be no reason. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>>>> Andreas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi team, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As you know, OSGi core 5.0.0 has been released. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I would like to discuss about which version of Karaf should support >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> version of the OSGi core (and so the corresponding OSGi >>>>>>> frameworks). >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have the following proposal: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0 >>>>>>>>> - Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0 >>>>>>>>> - Karaf 3.0.x => OSGi core 4.3.0 >>>>>>>>> - Karaf 3.1.x => OSGi core 5.0.0 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I would wait Karaf 3.1.x to update to OSGi core 5.0.0 as the OSGi >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> frameworks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> are not yet fully ready on this specification. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> WDYT ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> [email protected] >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >>> >> >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- -- Scott England-Sullivan ---------------------------------- FuseSource Web: http://www.fusesource.com Blog: http://sully6768.blogspot.com Twitter: sully6768
